+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Clinical importance of magnetic resonance cholangiography A comparative study to endoscopic retrograde cholangiography

Clinical importance of magnetic resonance cholangiography A comparative study to endoscopic retrograde cholangiography

Gastroenterology 110(4 Suppl. ): A457

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 030564733

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

Related references

Cholangiography by magnetic resonance for detection of cholelithiasis: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, operative cholangiography and percutaneous cholangiography. Revista de Gastroenterologia del Peru 26(2): 115-124, 2006

Diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis: a blinded comparative study using magnetic resonance cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 64(2): 219-223, 2006

Co19 Blinded Comparative Study Of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography (Mrc) Versus Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography (Erc) In The Diagnosis Of Sclerosing Cholangitis (Sc) In Children. Digestive and Liver Disease 44: S248-S249, 2012

Biliary imaging: magnetic resonance cholangiography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Journal of Hepatology 30(2): 334-338, 1999

Optimized magnetic resonance cholangiography Comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Gastroenterology 106(4 Suppl. ): A347, 1994

Magnetic resonance cholangiography compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences 19(12): 1150-1154, 2014

Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography as compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the evaluation of patients with biliary obstruction. Gastroenterology 106(4 Suppl. ): A344, 1994

Magnetic resonance cholangiography vs endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis A blinded case controlled study. Gastroenterology 116(4 Part 2): A9, 1999

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the accurate diagnosis of biliary complications after liver transplantation: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography - long-term follow-up. Clinical Transplantation 24(5): E163-E169, 2011

Adult-to-adult right lobe living donor liver transplantation: comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with standard T2-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography for evaluation of donor biliary anatomy. World Journal of Gastroenterology 12(36): 5820-5825, 2006

Five-year prospective audit of routine intravenous cholangiography and selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with or without intraoperative cholangiography in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World Journal of Surgery 24(3): 345-352, 2000

Magnetic resonance cholangiography: Comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 110(2): 589-597, 1996

Magnetic resonance cholangiography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 112(4 Suppl. ): A516, 1997

Prospective comparison of transcutaneous 3-dimensional US cholangiography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and direct cholangiography in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 58(6): 853-858, 2003

Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helical-computed-tomographic cholangiography. European Journal of Radiology 54(2): 271-275, 2005