+ Site Statistics
References:
52,654,530
Abstracts:
29,560,856
PMIDs:
28,072,755
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Cohabitation with farm animals in urban households with and without occupational farm work: associations between participation in educational activities and good hygiene practices in at-risk households cohabiting with farm animals



Cohabitation with farm animals in urban households with and without occupational farm work: associations between participation in educational activities and good hygiene practices in at-risk households cohabiting with farm animals



Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine 13(6): 322-331



This study was performed to investigate patterns of cohabitation with farm animals in urban households in Vientiane, Lao People's Democratic Republic, with regard to animal-to-human disease transmission. We also investigated the association between participation in hygiene-related educational activities and good hygiene practices in households with or without cohabitation with animals. A survey regarding cohabitation with animals, socioeconomic characteristics and participation in educational activities was conducted among 1,497 households randomly sampled from urban districts of Vientiane in 2001. Rates of satisfactory performance of recommended good hygiene practices according to a program commencing in 1996 were compared among households cohabiting with animals with or without participation in educational activities (reference group). Even among households not engaged in agriculture as a major source of income, 54.4, 34.9, 7.9, 3.1 and 35.7% cohabited with chickens, ducks, cattle, buffaloes and dogs, respectively. The percentage of households fulfilling the recommendations for good hygiene practices was 56.7%. The rates of satisfactory hygiene practices among households participating in health education and cohabitating with chickens, ducks or cattle were greater than those in the reference group (OR = 1.7, 95%CI = 1.2, 2.3; OR = 2.0, 95%CI = 1.3, 3.0; OR = 2.3, 95%CI = 1.0, 4.9) regardless of socioeconomic factors. Households cohabiting with animals showed poorer rates of satisfactory hygiene practices than those without animals. Cohabitation with farm animals is common in urban Vientiane regardless of household involvement in agriculture. Further effort is required to improve hygiene conditions, despite some positive effects of health education even in households cohabiting with animals.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 030595022

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 19568892

DOI: 10.1007/s12199-008-0046-9


Related references

Determinants of off-farm work participation by farm households in Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Tropical Forest Resources 14: 78-87, 1998

Female labour supply in farm households: farm and off-farm participation. Economic and Social Review 24(4): 313-334, 1993

Time allocation between farm and off-farm activities in Israeli farm households - 1995. Discussion Paper Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, Hebrew University of Jerusalem (14.01): 15 pp., 2001

Time allocation between farm and off-farm activities in Israeli farm households. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(3): 716-721, 2004

Summary of a study on consumption patterns of farm households in Taiwan with application of farm households record keeping data. Journal of Agricultural Economics (13): 179-182, 1972

Family composition and off-farm participation decisions in Israeli farm households. Discussion Paper Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, Hebrew University of Jerusalem (15.01): 27 pp., 2001

Family composition and off-farm participation decisions in Israeli farm households. American journal of agricultural economics 86(2): 502-512, 2004

Determinants of off-farm participation decision of farm households in Ethiopia. Agrekon 47(1): 140-161, 2008

Changes of Farm Lands to Urban Uses and Increase in Part-time Farm Households in the Vicinity of Tokyo. Journal of Geography 71(2): 60-72, 1962

Non-farm work and food security among farm households in Northern Ghana. Food Policy 36(2): 108-118, 2011

Local labour market and structure of labour force of farm households in paddy-cropping area increase in numbers of part-time farm households. Bulletin of the National Agriculture Research Center ( 20): 1-44, 1991

Pattern and level of on-farm and off-farm employment of farm households: evidences from an area of Gaibandha District. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Economics 25(1): 89-99, 2002

Measuring the well-being of farm households: farm, off-farm, and in-kind sources of income: discussion. American journal of agricultural economics 67(5): 1105-1107, 1985

Farm and off-farm labor: a cross-sectional analysis of Iowa farm households. Proceedings AAEA Meeting July 1980:, 1980

The well-being of farm households: farm, off-farm, and in-kind sources of income (4 papers). In: Proceedings AAEA annual meeting, Ames, Iowa, 4-7 August 1984. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67(5): 1087-1094; 1095-1099; 1100-1104; 1105-1107, 1985