+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Controlled clinical comparison of the BacT/alert aerobic FAN and standard anaerobic bottles for the detection of bloodstream infections



Controlled clinical comparison of the BacT/alert aerobic FAN and standard anaerobic bottles for the detection of bloodstream infections



Abstracts of the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents & Chemotherapy 36: 76




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 030714107

Download citation: RISBibTeXText


Related references

Controlled clinical comparison of the BacT/Alert aerobic and anaerobic FAN bottles for the detection of bloodstream infections. Abstracts of the General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology 97: 196, 1997

Reassessment of the incubation time in a controlled clinical comparison of the BacT/Alert aerobic FAN bottle and standard anaerobic bottle used aerobically for the detection of bloodstream infections. Diagnostic Microbiology & Infectious Disease 32(1): 1-7, 1998

Controlled Clinical Evaluation of the BACTEC Aerobic/F Resin and BacT/Alert Aerobic FAN Bottles for the Detection of Bloodstream Infections. Abstracts of the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents & Chemotherapy 35: 67, 1995

Controlled clinical comparison of BacT/ALERT standard aerobic and standard anaerobic blood culture bottles inoculated directly or after transport in sodium polyanethol sulfonate tubes. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 45(4): 1357-1359, 2007

Controlled clinical evaluation of BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F and BacT/Alert Aerobic FAN bottle for detection of bloodstream infections. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 33(11): 2856-2858, 1995

Controlled comparison of BacT/Alert FAN versus BacT/Alert Pedi-BacT medium for detection of bloodstream infections in pediatric patients at a Tertiary-care Medical Center. Abstracts of the General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology 98: 187, 1998

Controlled evaluation of BacT/Alert standard aerobic and FAN aerobic blood culture bottles for detection of bacteremia and fungemia. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 33(4): 978-981, 1995

Controlled evaluation of BacT/alert standard anaerobic and FAN anaerobic blood culture bottles for the detection of bacteremia and fungemia. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 33(9): 2265-2270, 1995

Controlled comparison of BACTEC Peds Plus/F versus BacT/Alert Pedi-BacT medium for detection of bloodstream infections in pediatric patients. Abstracts of the General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology 97: 196, 1997

Brucella detection in blood: comparison of the BacT/Alert standard aerobic bottle, BacT/Alert FAN aerobic bottle and BacT/Alert enhanced FAN aerobic bottle in simulated blood culture. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 7(7): 369-372, 2001

Evaluation of BACTEC Plus aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles and BacT/Alert FAN aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles for the detection of bacteremia in ICU patients. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 73(3): 239-242, 2012

Controlled clinical comparison of BacT/ALERT standard aerobic medium with BACTEC standard aerobic medium for culturing blood. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 41(6): 2391-2394, 2003

Clinical importance of increased sensitivity of BacT/Alert FAN aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 34(9): 2180-2184, 1996