+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Intrinsic variability in quantitative coronary angiography Enhancement by analysis in consecutive frames



Intrinsic variability in quantitative coronary angiography Enhancement by analysis in consecutive frames



European Heart Journal 14(ABSTR Suppl. ): 446




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 032025353

Download citation: RISBibTeXText


Related references

Variability in quantitative coronary angiography Higher precision by analysis in consecutive frames. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 0(SPEC ISSUE): 209A, 1994

Diagnostic accuracy in coronary stenosis: comparison between visual score and quantitative analysis (quantitative computed tomographic angiography) in coronary angiography by multidetector computed tomography-coronary angiography and quantitative analysis (quantitative coronary angiography) in conventional coronary angiography. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 34(5): 652-659, 2010

A paired-comparision of the Multifunction Cardiogram (MCG) and sestamibi SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) to quantitative coronary angiography for the detection of relevant coronary artery obstruction (≥70%) - a single-center study of 116 consecutive patients referred for coronary angiography. International Journal of Medical Sciences 8(8): 717-724, 2012

A rate of 125 frames/sec is sufficient for quantitative coronary angiography. European Heart Journal 14(ABSTR Suppl. ): 216, 1993

Variability of quantitative coronary angiography: an evaluation of on-site versus core laboratory analysis. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 19(6): 457-464, 2003

Influence of coronary artery stenosis severity and coronary collateralization on extent of chronic myocardial scar: insights from quantitative coronary angiography and delayed-enhancement MRI. Open Cardiovascular Medicine Journal 2: 79-86, 2008

Inter-core lab variability in analyzing quantitative coronary angiography for bifurcation lesions: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized trial. Jacc. Cardiovascular Interventions 8(2): 305-314, 2016

Shorter delay time reduces interpatient variability in coronary enhancement in coronary CT angiography using the bolus tracking method with 32-row CT. 2013

Shorter delay time reduces interpatient variability in coronary enhancement in coronary CT angiography using the bolus tracking method with 320-row CT. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 29(1): 185-190, 2013

Optimizing image contrast display improves quantitative stenosis measurement in heavily calcified coronary arterial segments on coronary CT angiography: A proof-of-concept and comparison to quantitative invasive coronary angiography. Academic Radiology 21(6): 797-804, 2015

Variability in measures of coronary lumen dimensions using quantitative coronary angiography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 22(4): 1068-1074, 1993

Variability of quantitative digital subtraction coronary angiography before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. American Journal of Cardiology 60(1): 55-60, 1987

Intravascular ultrasound vs quantitative coronary angiography A statistical comparison of 538 consecutive target lesions. Circulation 88(4 Part 2): I411, 1993

Delayed-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance coronary artery wall imaging: comparison with multislice computed tomography and quantitative coronary angiography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 50(5): 441-447, 2007

Quantitative analysis of 1.5-T whole-heart coronary MR angiograms obtained with 32-channel cardiac coils: a comparison with conventional quantitative coronary angiography. Radiology 271(2): 356-364, 2014