+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Microleakage of Class V composite restorations prepared conventionally with those prepared with an Er:YAG laser: a pilot study



Microleakage of Class V composite restorations prepared conventionally with those prepared with an Er:YAG laser: a pilot study



Pediatric Dentistry 15(6): 425-426




(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 032340853

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 8153007


Related references

Assessing microleakage of composite restorations in class V cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser irradiation or diamond bur. Journal of Conservative Dentistry 17(3): 216-219, 2014

Comparison of microleakage of three adhesive systems in class V composite restorations prepared with Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery 28(4): 505-510, 2010

Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation. Australian Dental Journal 53(2): 172-175, 2008

Comparison of marginal microleakage of flowable composite restorations in primary canine teeth prepared with high-speed diamond bur, Er:YAG laser and Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Laser Therapy 26(3): 195-202, 2017

Microleakage of composite fillings in Er,Cr:YSGG laser-prepared class II cavities. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 28(4): 371-374, 2001

Comparison of marginal microleakage of flowable composite restorations in primary molars prepared by high-speed carbide bur, Er:YAG laser, and air abrasion. Journal of Dentistry for Children 73(2): 122-126, 2006

Effects of different types of adhesive systems on the microleakage of compomer restorations in Class V cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser in primary teeth. Dental Materials Journal 31(2): 206-214, 2012

The effects of cavity-filling techniques on microleakage in class II resin restorations prepared with Er:YAG laser and diamond bur: A scanning electron microscopy study. Scanning 38(5): 389-395, 2015

Cervical margin integrity of Class II resin composite restorations in laser- and bur-prepared cavities using three different adhesive systems. Operative Dentistry 37(3): 316-323, 2012

In vitro microleakage of composite restorations prepared by Er:YAG/Er,Cr:YSGG lasers and conventional drills associated with two adhesive systems. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 11(3): 221-229, 2009

Comparison of total-etch, self-etch, and selective etching techniques on class V composite restorations prepared by Er:YAG laser and bur: a scanning electron microscopy study. Microscopy Research and Technique 79(10): 998-1004, 2016

Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er:YAG laser preparation. Operative Dentistry 26(5): 491-497, 2001

Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after conventional and Er:YAG laser preparation. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 32(9): 676-685, 2005

Er,Cr:YSGG laser influence on microleakage of class V composite resin restorations. Lasers in Medical Science 28(5): 1257-1262, 2014

Effects of pulsed Nd:YAG laser on microleakage of composite restorations in class V cavities. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery 23(1): 56-59, 2005