+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The Boston Teacher Questionnaire. 1. Definition of syndromes



The Boston Teacher Questionnaire. 1. Definition of syndromes



Journal of Child Neurology 8(1): 43-53



To obtain information about the academic function of 9-year-old children from their school teachers, we created a short, forced-choice questionnaire that asked about the child's knowledge and use of arithmetic tables, reading, spelling, persistence at tasks, flexibility of approach, ability to function independently, distractibility, daydreaming, impulsivity and overexcitability, hyperactivity, and ability to follow simple and sequential directions. Questionnaires were collected from the teachers of 3451 white children whose mothers had enrolled in the National Collaborative Perinatal Project. Six syndromes in girls and five in boys were identified by both cluster and factor analyses of these data. Common to both sexes were five syndromes we labeled arithmetic, tasks (ie, impersistent/dependent/inflexible), reading, attention, and hyperactive. A syndrome characterized by difficulty following directions was seen in girls only. The prevalence of these syndromes ranged from a low for hyperactivity of 2.3 per 100 girls to a high for the attention syndrome of 27.6 per 100 boys. The congruent results obtained with clustering and factor analysis, and the agreement between the observed prevalence of syndromes and prior expectations suggests that the Boston Teacher Questionnaire, as this instrument is called, identifies learning problems in 9-year-old children.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 033689889

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 8445171

DOI: 10.1177/088307389300800107


Related references

The Boston Teacher Questionnaire. 3. A reassessment. Journal of Child Neurology 8(1): 64-72, 1993

The Boston Teacher Questionnaire. 2. Assessments of validity. Journal of Child Neurology 8(1): 54-63, 1993

Boston conference on the diagnosis and management of birth defects malformation syndromes boston usa. Birth Defects Original Article Series 10(7): 1-197, 1974

Validity of the Child Psychiatric Hospital Teacher Questionnaire for the assessment of ADHD. Teacher's version. Actas Espanolas de Psiquiatria 37(3): 153-157, 2010

The Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire: Russian validation of the teacher version and comparison of teacher and student reports. Journal of Adolescence 35(1): 87-96, 2012

Testing the Multidimensionality in Teacher Interpersonal Behavior: Validating the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction Using the Rasch Measurement Model. Journal of Applied Measurement 16(4): 416-431, 2016

Teacher attitudes and information pertaining to mental deficiency; a comparison of regular grade and special class teacher responses to an attitude-information questionnaire. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 63(4): 566-574, 1959

Dash and Boston questionnaire assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome outcome: what is the responsiveness of an outcome questionnaire?. Journal of Hand Surgery 29(2): 159-164, 2004

A new definition of black Boston. Journal of Health & Social Policy 1(4): 145-148, 1989

Teacher definition. Academic Medicine 66(11): 681-681, 1991

Reliability of Thai version Boston questionnaire. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 91(8): 1250-1256, 2008

Spanish validation of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. Medicina Clinica 146(6): 247-253, 2015

Diagnostic utility of the McGill Pain Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire for classification of low back pain syndromes. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 15(2): 90-98, 1992

The structure and reliability of the Teacher Temperament Questionnaire. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 10(4): 531-545, 1982

Conners Teacher Questionnaire--norms and validity. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 10(3): 257-262, 1976