+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: surgical approach and prognostic factors



Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: surgical approach and prognostic factors



European Urology 53(4): 720-731



Open radical nephroureterectomy (O-RNU) has been the gold standard for the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUT-UC) for decades. With the advances in laparoscopic techniques and endourologic procedures, this concept has been increasingly challenged. Oncologic outcome prediction is mainly based on stage and grade. With progress in medical treatment, adjuvant therapies may gain importance in the future. This review assesses the values of the variety of available treatments as well as prognostic factors that may become relevant regarding patient selection for future adjuvant treatment trials. We performed a systematic literature research using MEDLINE with emphasis on open surgical, laparoscopic, and endourologic (ureteroscopic or percutaneous) techniques and prognostic contents. Overall, no evidence level 1 information from prospective randomised trials is available for treatment of UUT-UC. Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (L-RNU) is increasingly challenging open surgery. Currently, L-RNU should be reserved for low-stage, low-grade tumours. Ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephron-sparing techniques show favourable survival data but high local recurrence rates. Regarding prognosis, estimation of outcome still relies mainly on stage and grade because no additional parameters have been introduced in a routine clinical setting. O-RNU still represents the gold standard for the treatment of UUT-UC. The laparoscopic approach is not yet standard of care and should be reserved for low-stage, low-grade tumours. Endourologic nephron-sparing treatments are still experimental in elective indications due to high local recurrence rates. For prognosis, no parameters in addition to stage and grade have been standardised.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 034144686

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 18207315

DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.006


Related references

Survival and prognostic factors after surgical treatment of urothelial carcinoma in the upper urinary tract. Scandinavian Journal of Urology & Nephrology 37(Suppl 214): 42, 2003

Prognostic factors for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma after nephroureterectomy. Urologia Internationalis 88(2): 225-231, 2012

Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. Survival and prognostic factors. Archivos Espanoles de Urologia 51(3): 243-251, 1998

Prognostic value of MET, RON and histoprognostic factors for urothelial carcinoma in the upper urinary tract. Journal of Urology 179(3): 868-72; Discussion 872, 2008

Overexpression of stathmin is a poor prognostic factors for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. The Journal of Urology 179(4): 290-291, 2008

Preoperative prognostic factors after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. International Urology and Nephrology 45(1): 99-106, 2013

Prognostic value of prior history of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: results from a retrospective multicenter study. World Journal of Urology 33(7): 1005-1013, 2016

Independent prognostic factors for initial intravesical recurrence after laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Urologic Oncology 32(2): 146-152, 2014

Effect of surgical approach (laparoscopic or open) on overall survival after nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. The Journal of Urology 179(4): 291-292, 2008

Intraoperative prognostic factors and atypical patterns of recurrence in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma treated with laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy. Scandinavian Journal of Urology 50(4): 305-312, 2017

Prognostic significance of inflammation-based prognostic scoring in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. International Braz J Urol 45, 2019

Post-operative urothelial recurrence in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma managed by radical nephroureterectomy with an ipsilateral bladder cuff: Minimal prognostic impact in comparison with non-urothelial recurrence and other clinical indicators. Oncology Letters 6(4): 1015-1020, 2013

Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma with loco-regional nodal metastases: insights from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration. Bju International 110(11): E435; Author Reply E435-6, 2013

Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma with loco-regional nodal metastases: insights from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration. Bju International 108(8): 1286-1291, 2011

High expression of Chitinase 3-like-1 is an unfavorable prognostic factor in urothelial carcinoma of upper urinary tract and urinary bladder. Urologic Oncology 2019, 2019