+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Variability of BOLD response evoked by foot vibrotactile stimulation: influence of vibration amplitude and stimulus waveform

Variability of BOLD response evoked by foot vibrotactile stimulation: influence of vibration amplitude and stimulus waveform

Neuroimage 41(2): 504-510

The aim of the present was study to evaluate cortical and subcortical neural responses on vibrotactile stimulation of the food and to assess somatosensory evoked BOLD responses in dependence of vibration amplitude and stimulus waveform. Sixteen healthy male subjects received vibrotactile stimulation at the sole of the right foot. The vibration stimulus was delivered through a moving magnet actuator system (MMAS). In an event-related design, a series of vibration stimuli with a duration of 1 s and a variable interstimulus interval was presented. Four stimulation conditions were realized using a 2 (amplitudes 0.4 mm or 1.6 mm) x 2 (waveform sinusoidal or amplitude modulated) factorial design. Stimulating with 0.4 mm amplitude compared to 1.6 mm stimulus amplitude more strongly activated the pre- and postcentral gyrus bilaterally and the right inferior, medial and middle frontal gyrus. In the reverse comparison significant differences were observed within the left inferior parietal lobule, the left superior temporal gyrus, and the left temporal transverse gyrus. In the comparison of sinusoidal versus modulated waveform and vice versa no significant activation differences were obtained. The inter-subject variability was high but when all four stimulation conditions were jointly analyzed, a significant activation of S1 was obtained for every single subject. This study demonstrated that the BOLD response is modulated by the amplitude but not by the waveform of vibrotactile stimulation. Despite high inter-individual variability, the stimulation yielded reliable results for S1 on the single-subject level. Therefore, our results suggest that vibrotactile testing could evolve into a clinical tool in functional neuroimaging.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 034181956

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 18424181

DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.049

Related references

Influence of stimulus intensity on waveform of sympathetic skin response evoked by magnetic stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology 114(8): 1423-1430, 2003

Influence of evoked response latency and amplitude on stimulus artifact removal. Conference Proceedings 2010: 6091-6094, 2011

Amplitude response and stimulus presentation frequency response of human primary visual cortex using BOLD EPI at 4 T. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 40(2): 203-209, 1998

Perceived pitch of vibrotactile stimuli: effects of vibration amplitude, and implications for vibration frequency coding. Journal of Physiology 431: 403-416, 1990

The contribution of single trial response amplitude and variability to averaged evoked response amplitude in normal and downs syndrome individuals. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology 47(5): 25P-26P, 1979

Response Time to a Vibrotactile Stimulus Presented on the Foot at Rest and During Walking on Different Surfaces. Sensors 18(7), 2019

Activation in SI and SII: the influence of vibrotactile amplitude during passive and task-relevant stimulation. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 19(2): 174-184, 2004

Transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation: influence of electrode positioning and stimulus amplitude settings on muscle response. European Journal of Applied Physiology 111(10): 2451-2459, 2012

Waveform and amplitude characteristics of evoked responses to dendritic stimulation of CA1 guinea-pig pyramidal cells. Journal of Physiology 395: 419-439, 1988

Baseline BOLD correlation predicts individuals' stimulus-evoked BOLD responses. Neuroimage 54(3): 2278-2286, 2011

Effect of lingual vibrotactile stimulation on the averaged cortical evoked response. Perceptual and Motor Skills 57(2): 383-389, 1983

Relationship between stimulus intensity and the latency and amplitude of motor potentials evoked by cortical magnetic stimulation. Neurology 41(3 SUPPL 1): 123, 1991

Dissociation of psychophysical and EEG steady-state response measures of cross-modal temporal correspondence for amplitude modulated acoustic and vibrotactile stimulation. International Journal of Psychophysiology 89(3): 433-443, 2014

Auditory evoked magnetic fields: response amplitude vs. stimulus intensity. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 54(2): 147-152, 1982

Comparison of BOLD fMRI and MEG characteristics to vibrotactile stimulation. NeuroImage 19(4): 1778-1786, 2003