EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,517,315
Abstracts:
29,339,501
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

A comparison between buffalo and cow rumen fluids in terms of the in vitro fermentation characteristics of three fibrous feedstuffs



A comparison between buffalo and cow rumen fluids in terms of the in vitro fermentation characteristics of three fibrous feedstuffs



Journal of the Science of Food & Agriculture 84(7): 645-652



Rumen fluids from fistulated buffalos (Italy-BRF) and cows (Netherlands-CRF) were used as inocula to determine the fermentation kinetics of three forages. These were corn silage (CS), grass silage (GS) and wheat straw (WS) which had originated from both regions, giving six substrates in total. Fermentation kinetics was assessed by the measurement of cumulative gas production. Organic matter (OM) loss and volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration at the end of the fermentation period were also determined. Both BRF and CRF ranked the substrates in the same order for total VFA, total gas 44 production and the maximum rate of substrate degradation (CS > GS > WS). However, while the ranking of substrates was the same for both species, the absolute values differed significantly between the two inocula. Gas production, expressed as cumulative volume per unit mass of incubated (OMCV, ml g-1) and as cumulative volume per unit mass of OM degraded (OM ml g-1) for CRF was consistently higher than that for BRF for all substrates (p < 0.0001). VFA production, particularly of acetic and butyric acids, was significantly (p < 0.0001) lower for BRF than for CRF, though the digestibility of OM was the same for both inocula. VFA production predicted by the use of stoichiometric equations was generally higher than the observed gas production. These equations also predicted that the calculated amount of OM utilised for microbial growth was higher for BRF than for CRF. This may explain why diets having the same energy content but less protein can be fed to buffalo since they seem to have a lower requirement for protein compared with cattle. This possibility will need to be investigated in vivo. Given the similar ranking of feedstuffs between the two sources of inocula, these results suggest that either inoculum would be suitable for use in the cumulative gas production test as a measure of feedstuff evaluation. However, given the differences in absolute values, it is recommended that inocula from the species which will receive the feedstuff should be used. Copyright 2004 Society of Chemical Industry.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service: $29.90)

Accession: 034285134

Download citation: RISBibTeXText



Related references

A comparison between buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) and cow (Bos taurus) rumen fluids in terms of the in vitro fermentation characteristics of three fibrous feedstuffs. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 84(7): 645-652, 2004

Effect of non forage high fibrous feedstuffs as fiber sources in total mixed ration on gas production characteristics and in vitro fermentation. Pakistan Journal Of Nutrition: 3, 459-464, 2008

Effect of Sapindus mukorossi extracts on in vitro methanogenesis and fermentation characteristics in buffalo rumen liquor. Journal of Applied Animal Research 30(1): 1-4, 2006

A note on the comparison of gases from spontaneous and rumen fermentation of certain feedstuffs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 8(29): 391-395, 1947

Comparison of sheep and red deer rumen fluids for assessing nutritive value of ruminant feedstuffs. Journal of the science of food and agriculture 85(14): 2495-2502, 2005

Effect of amount and source of vegetable oils in a high fibrous cattle diet on in vitro rumen fermentation, nutrient degradability and rumen cis-9, trans-11 CLA concentration. 2012

Rumen fermentation kinetics and nitrogen degradability of commonly used ruminant feedstuffs in vitro. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology 7(1): 63-71, 2007

Rumen fermentation studies on two contrasting diets. 2. Comparison of the performance of an in vitro continuous-culture fermentation with in vivo fermentation. Journal of Agricultural Science, UK 89(1): 197-208, 1977

Rumen fermentation and microbial biomass synthesis indices of tropical feedstuffs determined by the in vitro gas production technique. Animal Feed Science and Technology 134(1-2): 170-179, 2007

In vitro fermentation characteristics of diets with different forage/concentrate ratios: comparison of rumen and faecal inocula. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 91(7): 1213-1221, 2012

Rumen fermentation studies on 2 contrasting diets part 2 comparison of the performance of an in vitro continuous culture fermentation with in vivo fermentation. Journal of Agricultural Science 89(1): 197-208, 1977

In vitro comparative digestibility by cow, buffalo and sheep rumen fluids. Buffalo Journal 14(1): 21-29, 1998

Comparison of buffalo rumen liquor and buffalo faeces as inoculum for the in vitro gas production technique. Italian Journal of Animal Science 4(Suppl. 2): 319-321, 2005

A study on the fermentation characteristics and on fermentation control of processed grain and meal in the rumen: I. Effect of processed corn, lupin seed and soybean on the fermentation characteristics in the rumen. Korean Journal of Animal Nutrition & Feedstuffs 18(3): 205-216, 1994

Rumen fermentation and degradability in buffalo and cattle using the in vitro gas production technique. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 92(3): 356-362, 2008