A comparison of the effects of neutral density filters and diffusing filters on motion detection perimetry, white on white perimetry and frequency doubling perimetry
Quaranta, L.; Membrey, W.L.; Unoki, K.; Kogure, S.; Fitzke, F.W.
IOVS Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 40(4): S67
1999
ISSN/ISBN: 0146-0404
Accession: 034286665
PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90
Related References
Hancock, S.; Wild, J.W.; Cunliffe, I.A. 1998: The between-visit reproducibility of White-on-White automated perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry and frequency doubling perimetry IOVS Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 39(4): S26Brusini, P. 2002: New techniques: frequency doubling technology perimetry, objective perimetry and flicker and motion perimetry Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. Suppl 236: 20
Liu, S.; Lam, S.; Weinreb, R.N.; Ye, C.; Cheung, C.Y.; Lai, G.; Lam, D.S.-C.; Leung, C.K.-S. 2011: Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 52(10): 7325-7331
Hu, R.; Wang, C.; Gu, Y.; Racette, L. 2016: Comparison of Standard Automated Perimetry, Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry, and Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry to Monitor Glaucoma Progression Medicine 95(7): E2618
Landers, J.; Goldberg, I.; Graham, S. 2000: A comparison of short wavelength automated perimetry with frequency doubling perimetry for the early detection of visual field loss in ocular hypertension Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 28(4): 248-252
Horn, F.K.; Brenning, A.; Jünemann, A.G.; Lausen, B. 2007: Glaucoma detection with frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength perimetry Journal of Glaucoma 16(4): 363-371
Leeprechanon, N.; Giangiacomo, A.; Fontana, H.; Hoffman, D.; Caprioli, J. 2007: Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma American Journal of Ophthalmology 143(2): 263-271
Serguhn, S.; Spiegel, D. 1999: Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry to standard achromatic automated perimetry in glaucoma IOVS Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 40(4): S842
Casson, R.; James, B.; Rubinstein, A.; Ali, H. 2001: Clinical comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and Humphrey perimetry British Journal of Ophthalmology 85(3): 360-362
Nitta, K.; Saito, Y.; Kobayashi, A.; Sugiyama, K. 2006: Influence of clinical factors on blue-on-yellow perimetry for diabetic patients without retinopathy: comparison with white-on-white perimetry Retina 26(7): 797-802
Kampmeler, J.M.; Eisert, B.; Lang, G.K.; Lang, G.E. 2000: Comparison of Frequency Doubling Perimetry vs standard automated perimetry in glaucoma and age-related maculopathy IOVS Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 41(4): S87
Serguhn, S.; Spiegel, D. 2001: Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry and standard achromatic computerized perimetry in patients with glaucoma Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 239(5): 351-355
Girkin, C.A.; Emdadi, A.; Sample, P.A.; Blumenthal, E.Z.; Lee, A.C.; Zangwill, L.M.; Weinreb, R.N. 1999: Comparison of short wavelength automated perimetry and conventional white-on-white perimetry in patients with progressive optic disk cupping IOVS Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 40(4): S581
Casson, E.J.; Johnson, C.A.; Shapiro, L.R. 1993: Longitudinal comparison of temporal-modulation perimetry with white-on-white and blue-on-yellow perimetry in ocular hypertension and early glaucoma Journal of the Optical Society of America. A Optics Image Science and Vision 10(8): 1792-1806
Gau, M.; Faude, F.; Weber, J.; Wiedemann, P. 2000: Blue-yellow perimetry in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Studies before and after therapy in comparison with white-white perimetry Der Ophthalmologe: Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft 97(5): 347-352
Göbel, K.; Erb, C. 2013: Sensitivity and specificity of flicker perimetry with Pulsar. Comparison with achromatic (white-on-white) perimetry in glaucoma patients Der Ophthalmologe: Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft 110(2): 141-145
Sarić, D.; Mandić, Z.; Iveković, R.; Geber, M.Z.ć; Benić, G.; Tomić, Z.; Grgić, D. 2005: Comparison of visual evoked potentials, automated perimetry and frequency-doubling perimetry in early detection of glaucomatous visual field loss Collegium Antropologicum 29(Suppl 1): 111-113
Inazumi, K.; Yamamoto, T.; Kondo, Y.; Matsubara, M.; Kitazawa, Y. 1998: A comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with W/W and B/Y perimetry in sensitivity threshold IOVS Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 39(4): S491
Wall, M.; Neahring, R.K.; Woodward, K.R. 2002: Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry IOVS Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 43(4): 1277-1283
Landers, J.A.; Goldberg, I.; Graham, S.L. 2003: Detection of early visual field loss in glaucoma using frequency-doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry Archives of Ophthalmology 121(12): 1705-1710