EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Comparison of a novel biphasic waveform with a damped sine wave monophasic waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation



Comparison of a novel biphasic waveform with a damped sine wave monophasic waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation



Journal of the American College of Cardiology 33(2 SUPPL A): 105A




(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 034617466

Download citation: RISBibTeXText



Related references

Comparison of a novel rectilinear biphasic waveform with a damped sine wave monophasic waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 34(5): 1595-1601, 1999

Multicenter comparison of truncated biphasic shocks and standard damped sine wave monophasic shocks for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. Transthoracic Investigators. Circulation 94(10): 2507-2514, 1996

Biphasic truncated waveform transthoracic defibrillation results in less post-shock ECG ST segment changes than standard damped sine wave shocks. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 0(SPEC ISSUE): 405A, 1995

Comparison of the rectilinear biphasic waveform with the monophasic damped sine waveform for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter. American Journal of Cardiology 93(12): 1495-1499, 2004

Transthoracic incremental monophasic versus biphasic defibrillation by emergency responders (TIMBER): a randomized comparison of monophasic with biphasic waveform ascending energy defibrillation for the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation. Circulation 114(19): 2010-2018, 2006

Multicenter comparison of truncated biphasic shocks and standard damped sine wave monophasic shocks for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. Circulation 94(10): 2507-2514, 1996

A randomized controlled trial of efficacy and ST change following use of the Welch-Allyn MRL PIC biphasic waveform versus damped sine monophasic waveform for external DC cardioversion. Resuscitation 71(2): 146-151, 2006

Transthoracic defibrillation of short-lasting ventricular fibrillation: a randomised trial for comparison of the efficacy of low-energy biphasic rectilinear and monophasic damped sine shocks. Acta Cardiologica 57(5): 329-334, 2002

Transthoracic biphasic waveform defibrillation at very high and very low energies: a comparison with monophasic waveforms in an animal model of ventricular fibrillation. Resuscitation 54(2): 183-186, 2002

Efficacy of very high and very low energy encircling overlapping waveform transthoracic defibrillation A comparison with monophasic waveform defibrillation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 35(2 suppl A): 399A, 2000

Comparison of monophasic and biphasic defibrillating pulse waveforms for transthoracic cardioversion. Biphasic Waveform Defibrillation Investigators. American Journal of Cardiology 75(16): 1135-1139, 1995

Comparison of effectiveness of relay switched one cycle quasisinusoidal waveform with critically damped sinusoid waveform in transthoracic defibrillation of 100 kilogram calves. Medical Instrumentation 22(6): 281-285, 1988

Transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of rectilinear biphasic versus damped sine wave monophasic shocks. Circulation 101(11): 1282-1287, 2000

A comparison of biphasic and monophasic waveform defibrillation after prolonged ventricular fibrillation. Chest 120(3): 948-954, 2001