EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Direct stenting without balloon predilation compared with conventional stenting in patients with acute myocardial infarction A multicenter randomized trial



Direct stenting without balloon predilation compared with conventional stenting in patients with acute myocardial infarction A multicenter randomized trial



Circulation 104(17 Supplement): II 622, October 23




(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 034744850

Download citation: RISBibTeXText



Related references

Randomized comparison of direct stenting and stenting after balloon predilation in acute myocardial infarction. European Heart Journal 24(Abstract Supplement): 84, August-September, 2003

Comparison of outcomes of direct stenting versus stenting after balloon predilation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (DIRAMI). American Journal of Cardiology 100(5): 798-805, 2007

Nonrandomized comparison of coronary stenting under intravascular ultrasound guidance of direct stenting without predilation versus conventional predilation with a semi-compliant balloon versus predilation with a new scoring balloon. American Journal of Cardiology 100(5): 812-817, 2007

Restenosis in direct coronary stenting compared to stenting with balloon predilation Results of the DISCO Trial. Circulation 104(17 Supplement): II 776, October 23, 2001

Direct coronary stenting without balloon predilation Immediate and 6 month results of a multicenter prospective randomized trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 37(2 Supplement A): 9A, February, 2001

A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Conventional Stenting Versus Direct Stenting in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction. Journal of Invasive Cardiology 27(9): 405-409, 2015

Comparison of the immediate and follow-up results of direct stenting and stenting with predilation in a multicenter, prospective and randomized study The DISCO trial. Circulation 104(17 Supplement): II 621-II 622, October 23, 2001

Results of the PIXEL study Randomized multicenter trial comparing direct and conventional predilation stenting in small vessels. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 41(6 Supplement A): 26A, March 19, 2003

Sidebranch occlusion after coronary stenting with or without balloon predilation: direct versus conventional stenting. Journal of Invasive Cardiology 14(9): 497-501, 2002

Intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: Restenosis after direct stenting versus stenting with predilation in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease (ISAR-DIRECT trial). Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 61(2): 190-195, 2004

Stenting versus non-stenting treatment of intermediate stenosis culprit lesion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology 14(2): 108-117, 2017

Direct stenting compared to conventional stenting in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Elective Angioplasty for Coronary Artery Disease (DECIDE): a multicenter, open label, randomized, controlled efficacy study. American Heart Journal 148(6): 1007-1011, 2005

Direct infarct artery stenting without predilation and no-reflow in patients with acute myocardial infarction. American Heart Journal 142(4): 684-690, 2001

Comparison of AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy before direct infarct artery stenting with direct stenting alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction. The JETSTENT trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 56(16): 1298-1306, 2010

A multicenter international randomized trial comparing infarct artery stenting alone with infarct artery stenting plus abciximab in acute myocardial infarction The abciximab and carbostent evaluation in acute myocardial infarction Trial Final results and one-year outcome. Circulation 108(17 Supplement): IV-578, October 28, 2003