+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation is more effective using anterior-posterior electrode positions than using anterior-lateral electrode positions Results of a randomized trial



External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation is more effective using anterior-posterior electrode positions than using anterior-lateral electrode positions Results of a randomized trial



European Heart Journal 22(Abstract Suppl.): 131




(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 034912743

Download citation: RISBibTeXText


Related references

Anterior-posterior vs. anterior-lateral electrode positions for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial. Acc Current Journal Review 12(2): 87-0, 2003

Anterior-posterior versus anterior-lateral electrode positions for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a randomised trial. Lancet 360(9342): 1275-1279, 2002

Anterior-posterior versus anterior-lateral electrode position for external electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases 107(5): 280-290, 2015

Anterior-posterior versus anterior-lateral electrode position for biphasic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Medicina 42(12): 994-998, 2007

Anterior-posterior electrode position led to more cardioversion success in atrial fibrillation. Acp Journal Club 138(3): 61, 2003

Randomised comparison of electrode positions for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Heart 81(6): 576-579, 1999

Comparison of two electrode positions in electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Medicina Intensiva 30(4): 137-142, 2006

Randomised comparison of antero-lateral versus antero-posterior paddle positions for DC cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation. International Journal of Cardiology 75(2-3): 211-216, 15 September, 2000

Randomized comparison of anterolateral versus anteroposterior electrode position for biphasic external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. American Heart Journal 150(1): 150-152, 2005

External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: the role of electrode position on cardioversion success. International Journal of Cardiology 137(1): E8-10, 2008

Improved clinical efficacy of external cardioversion by fluoroscopic electrode positioning and comparison to internal cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 22(1 Pt 2): 233-237, 1999

External cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: a reappraisal of the effects of electrode pad position and transthoracic impedance on cardioversion success. Japanese Heart Journal 44(6): 921-932, 2004

Comparison of antero-lateral versus antero-posterior electrode position for biphasic external cardioversion of atrial flutter. American Journal of Cardiology 104(11): 1547-1550, 2010

External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in young and old patients Results of a randomized trial comparing biphasic and monophasic shock. Circulation 108(17 Suppl.): IV-318, October 28, 2003

Electrode position in elective electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. A randomized study. Medicina Intensiva 34(4): 225-230, 2010