+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Inhibitory effect of explanted chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine impregnated central venous catheters on Staphylococcus epidermidis



Inhibitory effect of explanted chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine impregnated central venous catheters on Staphylococcus epidermidis



Abstracts of the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents & Chemotherapy 40: 422




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 035145408

Download citation: RISBibTeXText


Related references

Effectiveness of Minocycline/Rifampin vs Chlorhexidine/Silver Sulfadiazine-Impregnated Central Venous Catheters. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 221(4): 891-892, 2015

Impact of chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheters on in vitro quantitation of catheter-associated bacteria. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 34(10): 2640-2641, 1996

Effect of chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheters in an intensive care unit with a low blood stream infection rate after implementation of an educational program: a before-after trial. Surgical Infections 8(4): 445-454, 2007

Chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheters: in vitro antibacterial activity and impact on bacterial adhesion. New Microbiologica 35(2): 175-182, 2012

Evaluation of chlorhexidine and silver-sulfadiazine impregnated central venous catheters for the prevention of bloodstream infection in leukaemic patients: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Hospital Infection 37(2): 145-156, 1997

The effectiveness of chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine impregnated central venous catheters in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy followed by peripheral stem cell transplantation. European Journal of Cancer Care 18(5): 477-482, 2009

Chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated venous catheters save costs. American Journal of Infection Control 42(3): 321-324, 2014

Effectiveness of Minocycline and Rifampin vs Chlorhexidine and Silver Sulfadiazine-Impregnated Central Venous Catheters in Preventing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection in a High-Volume Academic Intensive Care Unit: A Before and after Trial. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 221(3): 739-747, 2015

Efficiency of chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated venous catheters at subclavian sites. American Journal of Infection Control 43(7): 711-714, 2015

Double-lumen central venous catheters impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine to prevent catheter colonisation in the intensive care unit setting: a prospective randomised study. Journal of Hospital Infection 72(3): 227-233, 2009

Chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated venous catheters are efficient even at subclavian sites without tracheostomy. American Journal of Infection Control 44(12): 1526-1529, 2016

Cost/benefit analysis of chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated venous catheters for femoral access. American Journal of Infection Control 42(10): 1130-1132, 2014

Effect of chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine coating on microbial colonization of central venous catheters in a multicenter trial. Abstracts of the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents & Chemotherapy 41: 439, 2001

Chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine- or rifampicin-miconazole-impregnated venous catheters decrease the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection similarly. American Journal of Infection Control 44(1): 50-53, 2016

Anaphylactic shock associated with a central venous catheter impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine. Masui. Japanese Journal of Anesthesiology 47(5): 556-561, 1998