+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction Impact on the cesarean delivery rate



Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction Impact on the cesarean delivery rate



American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 180(1 PART 2): S126




(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 035315471

Download citation: RISBibTeXText


Related references

Trial of labor after cesarean delivery A pilot study of oral misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening. Obstetrics & Gynecology 97(4 Suppl.): 68S, 2001

Cervical ripening and labor induction after previous cesarean delivery. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 38(2): 287-292, 1995

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Vaginal Misoprostol versus Cervical Foley Plus Oral Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction. Yearbook of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health 2009: 83-84, 2009

A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. American Journal of Perinatology 26(1): 33-38, 2008

Predictors of cesarean delivery in cervical ripening and labor induction with Foley catheter. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 2018: 1-6, 2018

Oral misoprostol vs. vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 89(2): 142-143, 2005

Cervical ripening and labor, induction with oral misoprostol vs mechanical methods of cervical ripening and oxytocin. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 180(1 PART 2): S126, 1999

Vaginal misoprostol is more effective with fewer side effects than oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 185(6 Suppl.): S204, 2001

Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction. Journal of Family Practice 45(1): 20, 1997

Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. Tennessee Medicine 94(1): 25-27, 2001

Cervical ripening and induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol and Foley catheter cervical traction. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 92(1): 79-80, 2005

Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction; a randomized study. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 178(1 PART 2): S94, 1998

Cervical ripening and labor induction Misoprostol vs dinoprostone. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 178(1 PART 2): S30, 1998

Safety of misoprostol as a cervical ripening agent in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstetrics & Gynecology 97(4 Suppl.): 67S, 2001

Combination of foley bulb and vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology 122(1): 156, 2013