EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,623,987
Abstracts:
29,492,080
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Multi-institutional survey on the value of lymphadenectomy in endometrial carcinoma in Germany



Multi-institutional survey on the value of lymphadenectomy in endometrial carcinoma in Germany



Gynakologisch-Geburtshilfliche Rundschau 43(2): 104-110



Introduction and Objective: Primary surgical staging has been established in the management of carcinoma of the endometrium. Various working groups have also recommended the use of lymphadenectomy. Contrary to the prognostic relevance of lymph node status, the therapeutic value of lymphadenectomy is still unclear. Method: A total of 1,030 standardised questionnaires were sent to gynaecological clinics (including in-patient clinics) in Germany as part of a cross-sectional study between October 2001 and January 2002. Results: It was possible to evaluate 595 (58%) of the questionnaires from 5.2% university clinics, 69.7% clinics for maximal treatment and 25% clinics for regular therapy. Is a lymphadenectomy performed in the case of a carcinoma of the endometrium? Only 7.3% (95% CI: 5.3-9.7%) reported that they never performed a lymphadenectomy, 62.9% (95% CI: 58.9-66.9%) performed one in special cases, 29.7 (95% CI: 26-33.7%) did so regularly. Which methods do you use for lymphadenectomy? 27.1% (95% CI: 23.2-31.4%) used 'sampling' and 72.9% (95% CI 68.6-76.8%) used the technique of systematic removal. 26.6% lymph node dissections were both pelvic as well as para-aortic. What is your intention when performing a lymphadenectomy? 31.7% (95 CI: 22.8-30.6%) performed it for staging reasons, 3.1% (95% CI: 1.8-4.9%) for the patient's survival and 65.2% (95% CI: 60.9-69.3%) for both of these reasons. 94.5% (95% CI: 92.1-96.3%) said that the status of the affected lymph nodes influenced the choice of adjuvant treatment. 76.8% (95% CI: 72.8-80.4%) and 36.9% (95% CI: 46.9-56.5%) chose radiotherapy in stages I/II and III/IV, respectively; 20.4% (95% CI: 16.9-24.2%) and 51.7% (95% CI: 46.9-56.5%) chose radiochemotherapy. Conclusions: The conception of prospective, multicentric studies of operative and adjuvant management should be based on these results.

(PDF same-day service: $19.90)

Accession: 035349258

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 12649583

DOI: 69163



Related references

Role of lymphadenectomy and its impact on survival in endometrial carcinoma - an institutional experience. Gulf Journal of Oncology 1(17): 30-33, 2015

Laparoscopy for bowel obstruction--a contradiction? Results of a multi-institutional survey in Germany. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 31(5): 1011-1019, 2016

Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 100(23): 1707-1716, 2008

Re: Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 101(12): 897-8; Author Reply 898-9, 2009

Multi-institutional comparison of treatment planning using stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma - benchmark for a prospective multi-institutional study. Radiation Oncology 8: 113-113, 2014

No overt influence of lymphadenectomy on cancer-specific survival in organ-confined versus locally advanced upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma undergoing radical nephroureterectomy: a retrospective international, multi-institutional study. World Journal of Urology 29(4): 465-472, 2012

A multi-institutional survey of the effectiveness of chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 34(10): 569-583, 2004

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy: multi-institutional analysis. Journal of Urology 152(4): 1188-91; Discussion 1191-2, 1994

Multi-institutional survey of radiotherapy for octogenarian squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: comparison with the results of surgery reported in Japan. Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. Nippon Acta Radiologica 59(3): 72-78, 1999

Melanoma patients with positive sentinel nodes who did not undergo completion lymphadenectomy: a multi-institutional study. Annals of Surgical Oncology 13(6): 809-816, 2006

Nuclear medicine utilization a multi institutional multi state survey. Freeman, L M (Ed ) Nuclear Medicine Annual, Xi+428p Raven Press: New York, N Y , Usa Illus P393-417, 1980

Is lymphadenectomy useful in the treatment of endometrial carcinoma. Gynecologic Oncology 38(1): 71-75, 1990

Emotional intelligence and perceived stress in healthcare students: a multi-institutional, multi-professional survey. Bmc Medical Education 9(): 61-61, 2010

Is aortic lymphadenectomy necessary in the management of endometrial carcinoma?. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology 28(2): 98-102, 2007