+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Multicenter evaluation of carbon-11 acetate PET imaging in men with PSA progression following radical prostatectomy

Multicenter evaluation of carbon-11 acetate PET imaging in men with PSA progression following radical prostatectomy

European Urology Supplements 2(1): 22

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 035349795

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

Related references

European multicenter evaluation of carbon-11 acetate positron emission tomography imaging in men with PSA progression following radical prostatectomy. Journal of Urology 169(4 Supplement): 291, 2003

Multicenter randomized comparative study of radical prostatectomy versus 3 and 6 months of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy prior to radical prostatectomy in stage B and C prostate cancer. Journal of Urology 163(4 Suppl ): 292, 2000

Role of abdominal obesity for functional outcomes and complications in men treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: results of the Multicenter Italian Report on Radical Prostatectomy (MIRROR) study. Scandinavian Journal of Urology 48(2): 138-145, 2014

Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center. Human Pathology 43(2): 254-260, 2012

Radical prostatectomy with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy under low-dose aspirin does not significantly increase blood loss. Urology 79(3): 591-595, 2012

Outcomes assessment in men undergoing open retropubic radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. World Journal of Urology 30(1): 85-89, 2012

Prospective evaluation of short-term impact and recovery of health related quality of life in men undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy. Journal of Urology 178(3 Pt 1): 854-8; Discussion 859, 2007

The combined percentage of gleason 4 and 5 is the best predictor of cancer progression after radical prostatectomy A multivariate analysis of 364 whole mount prostatectomy specimens. Journal Of Urology. 171(4 Supplement): 276, Il, 2004

Neoadjuvant hormone treatment with leuprolide acetate depot 3.75 mg and cyproterone acetate, before radical prostatectomy: a randomized study. Urologia Internationalis 72(3): 189-195, 2004

Intraoperative radiotherapy during radical prostatectomy for intermediate-risk to locally advanced prostate cancer: treatment technique and evaluation of perioperative and functional outcome vs standard radical prostatectomy, in a matched-pair analysis. Bju International 104(11): 1624-1630, 2010

11C-acetate positron-emission tomography/computed tomography imaging for detection of recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer. Bju International 120(3): 337-342, 2016

Nuclear roundness variance predicts prostate cancer progression, metastasis, and death: A prospective evaluation with up to 25 years of follow-up after radical prostatectomy. Prostate 70(12): 1333-1339, 2010

Carbon-11-acetate positron emission tomography (PET), versus fluorine- 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET and CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy in cases of prostate specific antigen of more than 1 to 3ng/mL. Hellenic Journal of Nuclear Medicine 16(2): 146-147, 2013

Evaluation of the prostate bed for local recurrence after radical prostatectomy using endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 85(2): 378-384, 2013

Radical prostatectomy: evaluation of learning curve outcomes laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic techniques with radical retropubic prostatectomy. Actas Urologicas Espanolas 32(10): 968-975, 2009