EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,623,987
Abstracts:
29,492,080
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Multicenter study of safety and efficacy of a biphasic impedance-compensating waveform for transthoracic defibrillation



Multicenter study of safety and efficacy of a biphasic impedance-compensating waveform for transthoracic defibrillation



Journal of the American College of Cardiology 43(5 Supplement A): 299A-300A, March 3




(PDF 0-2 workdays service: $29.90)

Accession: 035349938

Download citation: RISBibTeXText



Related references

Transthoracic impedance does not affect defibrillation efficacy in cardiac arrest victims when shocks are delivered with an impedance-compensating biphasic waveform. Circulation 96(8 SUPPL ): I561, 10/21/97, 1997

Transthoracic impedance does not affect defibrillation, resuscitation or survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with a non-escalating biphasic waveform defibrillator. Resuscitation 64(1): 63-69, 2005

Efficacy of very high and very low energy encircling overlapping waveform transthoracic defibrillation A comparison with monophasic waveform defibrillation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 35(2 suppl A): 399A, 2000

Transthoracic incremental monophasic versus biphasic defibrillation by emergency responders (TIMBER): a randomized comparison of monophasic with biphasic waveform ascending energy defibrillation for the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation. Circulation 114(19): 2010-2018, 2006

Comparison of a novel biphasic waveform with a damped sine wave monophasic waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 33(2 SUPPL A): 105A, 1999

Comparison of a novel rectilinear biphasic waveform with a damped sine wave monophasic waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 34(5): 1595-1601, 1999

Transthoracic ventricular defibrillation: Efficacy and safety of biphasic sinusoidal pulse. Anesteziologiya i Reanimatologiya 0(1): 44-47, 1999

Comparison of monophasic and biphasic defibrillating pulse waveforms for transthoracic cardioversion. Biphasic Waveform Defibrillation Investigators. American Journal of Cardiology 75(16): 1135-1139, 1995

Efficacy and safety of monophasic and biphasic waveform shocks using a braided endocardial defibrillation lead system. American Heart Journal 120(6 PART 1): 1342-1347, 1990

Biphasic waveform transthoracic defibrillation at very high and very low energies. Circulation 100(18 SUPPL ): I 91, Nov 2, 1999

Test of a new reduced-current biphasic waveform in transthoracic defibrillation of canines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 39(5 Supplement A): 120A, March 6, 2002

Changes in transthoracic impedance during sequential biphasic defibrillation. Resuscitation 78(2): 141-145, 2008

Performance of a rectilinear biphasic waveform in defibrillation of presenting and recurrent ventricular fibrillation: a prospective multicenter study. Resuscitation 82(6): 685-689, 2011

The addition of biphasic waveform to sequential pulse defibrillation improves defibrillation efficacy of a nonthoracotomy lead system. Clinical & Investigative Medicine 15(4 SUPPL): A14, 1992