EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,517,315
Abstracts:
29,339,501
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Prediction of maize single-cross hybrid performance: support vector machine regression versus best linear prediction



Prediction of maize single-cross hybrid performance: support vector machine regression versus best linear prediction



Tag. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. Theoretische und Angewandte Genetik 120(2): 415-427



Accurate prediction of the phenotypic performance of a hybrid plant based on the molecular fingerprints of its parents should lead to a more cost-effective breeding programme as it allows to reduce the number of expensive field evaluations. The construction of a reliable prediction model requires a representative sample of hybrids for which both molecular and phenotypic information are accessible. This phenotypic information is usually readily available as typical breeding programmes test numerous new hybrids in multi-location field trials on a yearly basis. Earlier studies indicated that a linear mixed model analysis of this typically unbalanced phenotypic data allows to construct epsilon -insensitive support vector machine regression and best linear prediction models for predicting the performance of single-cross maize hybrids. We compare these prediction methods using different subsets of the phenotypic and marker data of a commercial maize breeding programme and evaluate the resulting prediction accuracies by means of a specifically designed field experiment. This balanced field trial allows to assess the reliability of the cross-validation prediction accuracies reported here and in earlier studies. The limits of the predictive capabilities of both prediction methods are further examined by reducing the number of training hybrids and the size of the molecular fingerprints. The results indicate a considerable discrepancy between prediction accuracies obtained by cross-validation procedures and those obtained by correlating the predictions with the results of a validation field trial. The prediction accuracy of best linear prediction was less sensitive to a reduction of the number of training examples compared with that of support vector machine regression. The latter was, however, better at predicting hybrid performance when the size of the molecular fingerprints was reduced, especially if the initial set of markers had a low information content.

(PDF same-day service: $19.90)

Accession: 035535745

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 19904522

DOI: 10.1007/s00122-009-1200-5



Related references

Support vector machine regression for the prediction of maize hybrid performance. Tag. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. Theoretische und Angewandte Genetik 115(7): 1003-1013, 2007

Partial least squares regression, support vector machine regression, and transcriptome-based distances for prediction of maize hybrid performance with gene expression data. Tag. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. Theoretische und Angewandte Genetik 124(5): 825-833, 2012

Support vector machine versus logistic regression modeling for prediction of hospital mortality in critically ill patients with haematological malignancies. Bmc Medical Informatics and Decision Making 8(): 56-56, 2008

Prediction of retention indices for frequently reported compounds of plant essential oils using multiple linear regression, partial least squares, and support vector machine. Journal of Separation Science 36(15): 2464-2471, 2014

Prediction of Activity Cliffs Using Condensed Graphs of Reaction Representations, Descriptor Recombination, Support Vector Machine Classification, and Support Vector Regression. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 56(9): 1631-1640, 2016

Best linear unbiased prediction of maize single-cross performance. Crop Science 36(1): 50-56, 1996

Best linear unbiased prediction of maize single-cross performance given erroneous inbred relationships. Crop Science 36(4): 862-866, 1996

Prediction of sweetness by multilinear regression analysis and support vector machine. Journal of Food Science 78(9): S1445-S1450, 2014

Prediction of maize single-cross performance by mixed linear models with microsatellite marker information. Genetics and Molecular Research 9(2): 1054-1068, 2010

Testcross additive and dominance effects in best linear unbiased prediction of maize single-cross performance. Tag. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. Theoretische und Angewandte Genetik 93(7): 1098-1102, 1996

Prediction of single-cross hybrid performance in maize using haplotype blocks associated with QTL for grain yield. Tag. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. Theoretische und Angewandte Genetik 114(8): 1345-1355, 2007

Phase Space Prediction of Chaotic Time Series with Nu-Support Vector Machine Regression. Communications in Theoretical Physics 43(1): 102-106, 2005

Prediction of bioactivity of HIV-1 integrase ST inhibitors by multilinear regression analysis and support vector machine. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 23(6): 1648-1655, 2013

Prediction of bioactivity of ACAT2 inhibitors by multilinear regression analysis and support vector machine. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 23(13): 3788-3792, 2014

Prediction of human intestinal absorption by GA feature selection and support vector machine regression. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 9(10): 1961-1976, 2009