+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn

+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Treatment by endoscopic mucosal resection of sessile and flat polyps of the colon and rectum a study of 75 cases

Treatment by endoscopic mucosal resection of sessile and flat polyps of the colon and rectum a study of 75 cases

Digestive Disease Week Abstracts & Itinerary Planner : Abstract No W1141

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety and clinical outcome of EMR. METHODS: Data from consecutive EMR carried out between 1997 and 2001 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy five EMR procedures were performed on 68 patients. The mean size of polyps was 1.7 cm (range: 0.2-4). The lesions, of height less than a third of the diameter, were classified as superficial elevated (type IIa of the classification of early neoplasia of the digestive tract) in 65% of the cases ; flat (type IIb) in 28% ; slightly depressed (type IIc) in 7%. Locations were rectum 28%, left colon 19%, transverse 15%, caecum and ascending colon 38%. Saline solution assisted-snare resection was performed in 76% of cases, suction cap-assisted technique in 16%, and a simplified suction and cutting (without cap or saline solution) in 8%. Post-EMR histopathology was adenoma 57%, cancer 21% (high grade dysplasia 7%, Tis 9%, T1 5%), serrated adenoma 3%, hyperplasia 11%, hamartoma or inflammation 8%. Complete resection was achieved in 59 cases (79%). Three patients underwent a surgical resection for Tis (2 cases) or T1 (one case) where the margins of the resected lesion were healthy. The removed tissues contained no tumor residue and the lymph nodes were healthy. Thirty eight cases of adenoma or carcinoma were checked through follow-up coloscopy 3 to 6 months later (in 33 cases) or 9 to 24 months after the EMR. Through an average endoscopic follow up of 11 months, 7 recurrences (17% ; 5 cases of adenoma and 2 of high grade dysplasia) were detected during an examination which intervened between 3 to 6 months later, and were treated endoscopically. Six happened with lesions where the margins had proven affected through histology, and one concerned a lesion with healthy margins. The affected margins of resection proved to be the only predictive factor for recurrence by univariate analysis (p = 0.001). Complications were 8 cases (11%) of immediate bleeding all treated by means of local injection of adrenaline and saline solution (1/10000) and 3 (4%) perforations that occurred on the right colon after use of the suction cap. Two were treated surgically (one coelioscopic suture, one right hemicolectomy) and one by 8 clips implanted with endoscopy. There was no mortality. CONCLUSIONS: EMR is an effective treatment for sessile and flat lesions of the colon and rectum. In the case of an incomplete resection, endoscopic follow up must be scheduled at 3 months. The suction cap-assisted technique is associated with a high risk of perforation.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 035980086

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

Related references

Endoscopic mucosal resection of 161 cases of large sessile or flat colorectal polyps. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 42(7): 859-866, 2007

Sa1154 Hot SNARE Versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Polypectomy for the Complete Resection of 5-9 mm Sized Flat or Sessile Colorectal Polyps. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 83(5): Ab233-Ab234, 2016

PTU-015Incidence of polyp recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and sessile colonic polyps. Gut 59(Suppl 1): A54.2-A54, 2010

Effect of time of day and daily endoscopic workload on outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile colon polyps. United European Gastroenterology Journal 7(1): 146-154, 2019

Efficacy, safety and outcomes of 'inject and cut' endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile and flat colorectal polyps. Digestion 82(4): 213-220, 2011

Prophylactic endoscopic coagulation to prevent bleeding after wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection of large sessile colon polyps. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 13(4): 724-30.E1-2, 2015

Is the double channel gastroscope useful in endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile colon polyps?. Clinical Endoscopy 48(2): 89-90, 2015

Endoscopic mucosal resection for large and giant sessile and flat colorectal polyps: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up. Endoscopy 41(10): 829-835, 2010

PWE-196Endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and sessile polyps in the colon: safety, efficacy and clinical outcomes from a large data base in the UK tertiary referral centre. Gut 61(Suppl 2): A376.2-A377, 2012

Complete endoscopic mucosal resection of malignant colonic sessile polyps and clinical outcome of 51 cases. Annals of Gastroenterology 32(2): 174-177, 2019

Endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential incision for the treatment of large sessile polyps and laterally spreading tumors of the colorectum. Clinical Endoscopy 48(1): 52-58, 2015

Complete endoscopic resection of large sessile or flat colorectal polyps with high-magnification chromoendoscopy or endoscopic submucosal dissection. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 43(8): 1016-1017, 2009

Endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection methods for the removal of large sessile polyps. Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery 28(1): 17-23, 2017

A prospective comparative study of blended and pure coagulation current in endoscopic mucosal resection of large sessile colorectal polyps. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques 24(3): 226-231, 2015

A successful single-step endoscopic resection of a 40 millimeter flat-elevated tumor in the rectum: endoscopic mucosal resection using sodium hyaluronate. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 50(5): 701-704, 1999