EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,623,987
Abstracts:
29,492,080
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Treatment delivery and guidelines in primary care



Treatment delivery and guidelines in primary care



British Medical Bulletin 57: 193-206



Because depressive illness is so prevalent, the majority of patients are managed in primary care, without recourse to specialist services. Primary care management is seen to fall short of the standards set in secondary care, but unfortunately there is as yet relatively little evidence from primary care to guide management in this distinctive patient population. Guidelines have been introduced as a means of quality management, and their value in improving care has been assessed in trials. To date, the benefits of the implementation of guidelines have been marginal at best. By contrast, strategies which improve the access of patients to specialist services do seem to be beneficial. There is also evidence that such strategies may be associated with 'cost-offset'. Choice of antidepressant medication for maximum cost benefit should also be informed by an evidence base, which is beginning to be accumulated. Further research on this topic in the primary care context is still needed.

(PDF same-day service: $19.90)

Accession: 035980124

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 11719918

DOI: 10.1093/bmb/57.1.193



Related references

Paradigms of care delivery are now needed. Comment to "Routine primary care management of acute low back pain: adherence to clinical guidelines" by V. González-Urzelai et al. European Spine Journal 12(6): 595-595, 2004

Differences between training GPs to manage depression in primary care and issuing them with guidelines, and a system of collaborative care in the treatment of depression between primary and secondary care. Psychiatria Danubina 23 Suppl 1: S79-S82, 2011

International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG) Guidelines: integrating diagnostic guidelines for managing chronic respiratory diseases in primary care. Primary Care Respiratory Journal 15(1): 13-19, 2006

Impact of the Provider and Healthcare team Adherence to Treatment Guidelines (PHAT-G) intervention on adherence to national obesity clinical practice guidelines in a primary care centre. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 21(2): 300-306, 2016

Treatment of patients with lipid disorders in the primary care setting: new treatment guidelines and their implications. Southern Medical Journal 96(3): 266-275, 2003

PTSD treatment of African American adults in primary care: the gap between current practice and evidence-based treatment guidelines. Journal of the National Medical Association 103(7): 585-593, 2011

"Guidelines for the treatment of depression in primary care" and the APA response. American Psychologist 50(6): 453-455, 1995

It's health care delivery, stupid: implementing the New Canadian Cardiovascular Society atrial fibrillation treatment guidelines. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 27(1): 14-18, 2011

Treatment guidelines of acute poisoning in primary care setting. Chudoku Kenkyu 17(3): 233-240, 2004

Low Concordance With Guidelines for Treatment of Acute Cystitis in Primary Care. Open Forum Infectious Diseases 2(4): Ofv159-Ofv159, 2016

Primary care clinician compliance with cholesterol treatment guidelines. Journal of General Internal Medicine 6(2): 121-125, 1991

Compliance with guidelines in the treatment of asthma exacerbations in primary care. Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease 5(6): 369-375, 2012

Implementing treatment guidelines for type 2 diabetes in primary care. Postgraduate Medicine 121(2): 125-138, 2009

Treatment of acne vulgaris. Guidelines for primary care physicians. Postgraduate Medicine 89(8): 40-2, 45-7, 1991

Adherence to treatment guidelines in two primary care populations with gout. Rheumatology International 30(6): 749-753, 2010