+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Treils three-dimensional cephalometry using computed tomography Prospects in physical anthropology

Treils three-dimensional cephalometry using computed tomography Prospects in physical anthropology

American Journal of Physical Anthropology Supplement (32): 151

(PDF 0-2 workdays service: $29.90)

Accession: 035985008

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

Related references

Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Cephalometry Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 26(4): E311-E315, 2016

A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls. European Journal of Oral Sciences 117(3): 300-305, 2009

A new method for improved standardisation in three-dimensional computed tomography cephalometry. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 13(1): 59-69, 2010

Three-dimensional computed tomography cephalometry of plagiocephaly: asymmetry and shape analysis. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 43(2): 201-210, 2006

Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 130(3): 410-416, 2006

A new mandible-specific landmark reference system for three-dimensional cephalometry using cone-beam computed tomography. European Journal of Orthodontics 38(6): 563-568, 2015

A comparative study between data obtained from conventional lateral cephalometry and reconstructed three-dimensional computed tomography images. Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 40(3): 123-129, 2014

Cone-beam computed tomography: accuracy of three-dimensional cephalometry analysis and influence of patient scanning position. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 23(4): 1038-1043, 2013

Frameless image-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung tumors with 4-dimensional computed tomography or 4-dimensional positron emission tomography/ computed tomography. Clinical Lung Cancer 12(3): 180-186, 2011

Reliability of classification of ring and little finger carpometacarpal joint fracture subluxations: a comparison between two-dimensional computed tomography and three-dimensional computed tomography classifications. Journal of Hand Surgery, European Volume 41(4): 448-452, 2015

Evaluation of 4-dimensional computed tomography to 4-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography deformable image registration for lung cancer adaptive radiation therapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 86(2): 372-379, 2013

Comparison of primary tumour volumes delineated on four-dimensional computed tomography maximum intensity projection and (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography images of non-small cell lung cancer. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology 59(5): 623-630, 2015

Geometrical differences in target volumes based on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and four-dimensional computed tomography maximum intensity projection images of primary thoracic esophageal cancer. Diseases of the Esophagus 27(8): 744-750, 2015