EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,623,987
Abstracts:
29,492,080
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Trends in gleason grading in Germany Evaluation using prostate cancer tissue microarrays



Trends in gleason grading in Germany Evaluation using prostate cancer tissue microarrays



Journal of Urology 171(4 Supplement): 224, April




(PDF 0-2 workdays service: $29.90)

Accession: 035985346

Download citation: RISBibTeXText



Related references

Trends in Gleason grading in Germany: evaluation using prostate cancer tissue microarrays an interim report. Pathology - Research and Practice 200(4): 271-0, 2004

Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading: evaluation using prostate cancer tissue microarrays. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 134(10): 1071-1078, 2008

Evaluation of the interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma using tissue microarrays. Human Pathology 34(5): 444-449, 2003

Nuclear grading versus Gleason grading in small samples containing prostate cancer: a tissue microarray study. Pathology Oncology Research 16(4): 479-484, 2011

Recent trends in Gleason grading of prostate cancer: I. Pattern interpretation. Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology 30(4): 190-198, 2008

Recent trends in gleason grading of prostate cancer. II. Prognosis, reproducibility and reporting. Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology 30(5): 254-260, 2008

Future-proofing Gleason Grading: What to Call Gleason 6 Prostate Cancer?. European Urology 68(1): 1-2, 2016

Web-based tissue microarray image data analysis: initial validation testing through prostate cancer Gleason grading. Human Pathology 32(4): 417-427, 2001

Prostate Cancer Grading: A Decade After the 2005 Modified Gleason Grading System. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 140(10): 1140-1152, 2016

Prostate Cancer Grading: A Decade After the 2005 Modified Gleason Grading System. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 141(2): 182-183, 2017

Prognostic evaluation of prostatic cancer by Gleason's histopathologic grading and tissue DHT level. Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. Japanese Journal of Urology 79(7): 1228-1234, 1988

Prognostic significance of histological grading for patients with prostate cancer assessed by Gleason and WHO grading systems in preradiotherapy needle biopsies. Laboratory Investigation 81(1): 115A, January, 2001

Prostate cancer specific mortality and Gleason 7 disease differences in prostate cancer outcomes between cases with Gleason 4 + 3 and Gleason 3 + 4 tumors in a population based cohort. Journal of Urology 182(6): 2702-2707, 2009

New Prostate Cancer Grading System Predicts Long-term Survival Following Surgery for Gleason Score 8-10 Prostate Cancer. European Urology (): -, 2016

Expression of microRNAs associated with Gleason grading system in prostate cancer: miR-182-5p is a useful marker for high grade prostate cancer. Prostate 73(8): 827-834, 2013