EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,623,987
Abstracts:
29,492,080
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Trends in live birth prevalence of congenital anomalies 1979-1999 The impact of prenatal diagnosis



Trends in live birth prevalence of congenital anomalies 1979-1999 The impact of prenatal diagnosis



European Journal of Human Genetics 10(Supplement 1): 275




(PDF 0-2 workdays service: $29.90)

Accession: 035985409

Download citation: RISBibTeXText



Related references

Impact of prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound on the prevalence of congenital anomalies at birth in southern France. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 48(3): 290-296, 1994

Trends in live birth prevalence of down syndrome in the Northern Netherlands 1987-96: the impact of screening and prenatal diagnosis. Prenatal Diagnosis 20(9): 709-713, 2000

Impact of prenatal diagnosis on the prevalence of chromosomal anomalies at birth. Ducimetiere, P, Montaville, B, Schaffer, P, Spira, N, Analyses and Future Prospects; Health research and policy: The contribution of the morbidity registries, Analyses et Prospective; Recherche et politiques de sante: L'apport des registres de morbidite: 219-223, 1992

Prenatal diagnosis, its potential impact on the prevalence and management of congenital anomalies. Saudi Medical Journal 19(2): 130-135, 1998

Impact of prenatal diagnosis on livebirth prevalence of children with congenital anomalies. Annales de Genetique 45(3): 115-121, July-September, 2002

Recent trends in the birth prevalence of Down syndrome in China: impact of prenatal diagnosis and subsequent terminations. Prenatal Diagnosis 35(4): 311-318, 2016

Prevalence and distribution of congenital cardiopathy at birth and in pregnancy termination: impact of prenatal diagnosis in 4 years of experience. Acta Bio-Medica de L'ateneo Parmense 71 Suppl 1(): 487-492, 2001

Temporal trends in the prevalence of congenital malformations at birth based on the birth defects monitoring program, United States, 1979-1987. Mmwr. Cdc Surveillance Summaries 39(4): 19-23, 1990

The influence of prenatal ultrasound on the prevalence of congenital anomalies at birth. Prenatal Diagnosis 17(7): 623-628, 1997

Trends in the prevalence at birth of congenital anomalies in the Umbrian region. The Umbria Congenital Malformation Research Study Group. Epidemiologia E Prevenzione 13(48-49): 194-195, 1991

Temporal trends in the birth prevalence of selected congenital malformations in the Birth Defects Monitoring Program/Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities, 1979-1989. Teratology 48(6): 647-649, 1993

Impact of ultrasound screening on the prevalence of congenital anomalies at birth. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 174(1 PART 2): 427, 1996

Trends in congenital malformations, 1974-1999: effect of prenatal diagnosis and elective termination. Obstetrics and Gynecology 105(4): 902-3; Author Reply 903, 2005

Congenital anomalies: Impact of prenatal diagnosis on mode of delivery. Irish Medical Journal 103(3): 88-89, 2010

Impact of prenatal screening and diagnosis on the epidemiology of structural congenital anomalies. Journal of Medical Screening 2(2): 67-70, 1995