EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,623,987
Abstracts:
29,492,080
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Trial of labor compared with elective repeat cesarean section in twin gestations with previous cesarean delivery



Trial of labor compared with elective repeat cesarean section in twin gestations with previous cesarean delivery



American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 184(1): S183, January



OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity rates in twin gestations undergoing a trial of labor versus elective repeat cesarean section after prior cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: Data were obtained from the Nova Scotia Atlee Perinatal Database from 1980 to 1999. The cohort consisted of mothers with twin gestations who had one or more previous lower-segment cesarean sections and a vertex presentation of the first twin. Categorical data were compared by use of chi2 or Fisher exact tests as appropriate. Continuous data were analyzed by the Student t test. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one women with a twin gestation had one or more previous lower segment cesarean sections. Thirty-eight (31.4%) had a trial of labor, and 83 (68.6%) had an elective repeat cesarean section. Of the patients in the trial of labor group, 23.7% had a cesarean section, including 2 for the second twin. There were no uterine ruptures, incidents of scar dehiscence, or maternal deaths. Patients in the trial of labor group had a higher incidence of early postpartum hemorrhage (P = .01). Patients in the elective cesarean group had a higher incidence of infectious morbidity (P = .04). There was no increase in neonatal mortality or morbidity rates in those undergoing a trial of labor compared with elective repeat cesarean section. CONCLUSIONS: In our 19-year experience, trial of labor in twin gestations with a vertex presentation of the first twin and a history of cesarean section is associated with a high success rate of vaginal delivery without increased serious maternal morbidity or adverse neonatal outcomes. In this group of women a cautious trial of labor may be a safe alternative to elective repeat cesarean section.

(PDF 0-2 workdays service: $29.90)

Accession: 035985883

Download citation: RISBibTeXText



Related references

Trial of labor versus elective repeat cesarean section for the women with a previous cesarean section: a decision analysis. Proceedings. AMIA Symposium: 226-230, 1999

Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat Cesarean delivery versus a trial of labor after previous Cesarean delivery in a community teaching hospital. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 15(4): 243-246, 2004

Neonatal outcome after trial of labor or elective cesarean section in relation to the indication for the previous cesarean delivery. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 92(10): 1151-1158, 2014

Elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 195(): 214-218, 2016

Elective repeat cesarean delivery compared with spontaneous trial of labor after a prior cesarean delivery: a propensity score analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 206(4): 311.E1-9, 2012

Comparison of maternal mortality and morbidity between trial of labor and elective cesarean section among women with previous cesarean delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 191(4): 1263-1269, 2004

Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 199(3): 224-231, 2008

Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 92(11): 1256-1263, 2013

Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat cesarean versus a trial of labor after previous cesarean in a community teaching hospital. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 187(6 Supplement): S104, December, 2002

Neonatal outcome after trial of labor compared with elective repeat cesarean section. Birth 30(2): 83-88, 2003

Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology 108(1): 125-133, 2006

Trial of labor after cesarean delivery in twin gestations: systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2018: -, 2018

Timing of elective repeated cesarean delivery in patients with previous two or more cesarean section. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine 26(1): 10-12, 2013

Trial of labor compared with an elective second cesarean section. New England Journal of Medicine 336(9): 658; Author Reply 659-658; Author Reply 659, 1997

Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery Versus Trial of Labor. Obstetrics & Gynecology 83(6): 927-932, 1994