+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Mandatory triage does not identify high-acuity patients within recommended time frames



Mandatory triage does not identify high-acuity patients within recommended time frames



Annals of Emergency Medicine 58(2): 137-142



We determine whether mandatory formal triage of walk-in emergency department (ED) patients provides timely recognition of the most acutely ill. This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a US urban academic ED, annual census 39,000, which uses Emergency Severity Index-5 triage (ESI-5) for all arriving patients. ESI-5 recommends that level 1 and 2 patients be treated by a physician immediately or within 10 minutes, respectively. For all high-acuity (ESI 1 or 2) patients presenting between January 1 and December 31, 2008, data from electronic medical records and registration and tracking systems were used to determine elapsed time from arrival to completion of triage (median, range, 95th percentile), proportion of these intervals that met ESI-5 recommendations, and whether triage throughput differed during peak arrival hours. For 3,932 high-acuity walk-in visits (ESI 1=63; ESI 2=3,869), median time from arrival to triage completion was 12.3 minutes, range 0 to 128 minutes. Twenty-seven percent (95% confidence interval [CI] 26% to 29%) of high-acuity patients were taken to rooms on arrival; 41% (95% CI 40%, 43%), including those roomed immediately, completed triage within 10 minutes. Twenty-five percent (95% CI 24% to 26%) completed triage in greater than 20 minutes and 10% (95% CI 9% to 11%) greater than 30 minutes after arrival. Between 10 am and 10 pm (peak arrival hours), triage took longer for level 2 patients, and fewer met ESI recommendations. Less than half of high-acuity patients in this urban ED completed triage within time frames recommended by the ESI-5, resulting in potentially unsafe delays. Although mandatory formal triage theoretically identifies patients who should be treated most quickly, the value and safety of this process should be reassessed.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036074667

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21514968

DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.02.001


Related references

Low acuity EMS dispatch criteria can reliably identify patients without high-acuity illness or injury. Prehospital Emergency Care 11(1): 42-48, 2006

Percentage of US emergency department patients seen within the recommended triage time: 1997 to 2006. Archives of Internal Medicine 169(20): 1857-1865, 2009

A pilot study examining the speed and accuracy of triage for simulated disaster patients in an emergency department setting: Comparison of a computerized version of Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS) and Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) methods. Cjem 19(5): 364-371, 2017

ED triage of patients with acute myocardial infarction: predictors of low acuity triage. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 28(6): 694-702, 2010

Does the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale identify non-urgent patients who can be triaged away from the emergency department?. Cjem 6(5): 337-342, 2004

Effects of a Web-Based Korean Triage and Acuity Scale Learning Program on Triage Self-Efficacy and Triage Performance Ability for Nurses in Emergency Department. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 49(2): 171-180, 2019

Comparison of Canadian triage acuity scale to Australian Emergency Mental Health Scale triage system for psychiatric patients. International Emergency Nursing 23(2): 138-143, 2015

Mandatory pain scoring at triage reduces time to analgesia. Annals of Emergency Medicine 59(2): 134-8.E2, 2012

Predictors of outcomes in medically treated patients with acute coronary syndromes after angiographic triage: an Acute Catheterization And Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) substudy. Circulation 121(7): 853-862, 2010

Time frames for analysis of inflammatory mediators in acute pancreatitis: improving admission triage. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 54(10): 2282-2287, 2009

The failure of triage criteria to identify geriatric patients with trauma: results from the Florida Trauma Triage Study. Journal of Trauma 40(2): 278-283, 1996

Changes in Relative Importance of the 5-Level Triage System, Korean Triage and Acuity Scale, for the Disposition of Emergency Patients Induced by Forced Reduction in Its Level Number: a Multi-Center Registry-based Retrospective Cohort Study. Journal of Korean Medical Science 34(14): E114, 2019

Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL cytology: use of qualitative assessment of p16INK4a positive cells to identify patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cancer 111(1): 58-66, 2007

Over-triage occurs when considering the patient's pain in Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS). Plos one 14(5): E0216519, 2019

Validation of the Taiwan triage and acuity scale: a new computerised five-level triage system. Emergency Medicine Journal 28(12): 1026-1031, 2011