+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Social cost-benefit analysis of intensive versus traditional shrimp farming A case study from India



Social cost-benefit analysis of intensive versus traditional shrimp farming A case study from India



Natural Resources Forum (John Wiley and Sons) 35(4): 321-333



This paper attempts a social cost-benefit analysis of intensive versus traditional shrimp farming in West Bengal, India. Using primary data, the paper shows that although intensive shrimp farming yields high returns as compared to traditional shrimp farming, when the opportunity costs and environmental costs of shrimp farming, including disease risk, are accounted for, intensive shrimp farming loses its advantage. Sensitivity analysis shows that if the expected benefits were to fall short by 15% and costs rise by a similar proportion, intensive shrimp farmers would report higher losses than traditional shrimp farmers. Large traditional shrimp farmers continue to report positive net returns. These results are also most pronounced for small and marginal intensive shrimp farmers. Further, if the probability of disease risk is also accounted for, intensive shrimp farming reports significant losses whereas traditional shrimp farming in most cases shows positive net returns. In light of the high social costs and risks, this paper questions the rationale behind promoting intensive shrimp farming, especially among small and marginal holdings, as an income-generating activity or poverty alleviation measure in the absence of an enabling environment. It suggests that policymakers need to factor in sustainability concerns and the local context when formulating policies to promote intensive shrimp farming.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036112863

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2011.01385.x


Related references

Benefit cost analysis of the maize crop under mechanized and traditional farming systems in the NWFP. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 23(1): 169-176, 2007

Bio-gas for fuel and fertilizers in rural India - a social benefit-cost analysis. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 31(3): 219-231, 1976

Economic appraisal of bio-gas units in India: a framework for social benefit cost analysis. Economic and Political hweekly 12(33/34): 1503-1518, 1977

Social cost-benefit analysis of a Watershed Development Project in Karnataka, India. Ambio 30(3): 157-161, 2001

Basic Needs versus Distributional Weights in Social Cost-Benefit Analysis. Economic Development and Cultural Change 32(3): 455-474, 1984

Pilot intensive rural employment project in Trithala block of Kerala: social cost-benefit analysis of selected works. Pilot intensive rural employment project in Trithala block of Kerala: social cost benefit analysis of selected works: 84, 1978

The prevention of farm level food grain storage losses in India: a social cost benefit analysis. Tropical Stored Products Information (37): 11-17, 1979

The prevention of farm level food grain storage losses in India: a social cost-benefit analysis. The prevention of farm level food grain storage losses in India: a social cost benefit analysis: 239, 1978

Economic and social cost-benefit analysis of an aquifer remediation process; the Buenavista case. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Geologica, 1995

Control of the bovine pestivirus syndrome in cattle: a case for social cost-benefit analysis. Proceedings of a meeting Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine: 4-65, 1986

Social cost-benefit analysis of Karnataka Watershed Development (KAWAD) project, Karnataka, India. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 15(2): 170-177, 2008

A social cost-benefit analysis of road building for agricultural development: a case study from Tanzania. Journal of Agricultural Economics 24(2): 311-319, 1973

Social cost-benefit analysis in practice: some reflections in the light of case studies using Little-Mirrlees techniques. World Development 6(2): 153-165, 1978

Impact of surfactant treatment on cost of neonatal intensive care: a cost-benefit analysis. Journal of Perinatology 10(4): 416-419, 1990

A social cost benefit analysis of grid-scale electrical energy storage projects: A case study. Applied Energy 212: 881-894, 2018