+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale



Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale



Journal of Orthopaedic Science 16(4): 339-346



Until recently, no Japanese versions have existed of the more popular, patient-reported disability questionnaires for neck pain. This study aimed to test the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS), one of the most widely used questionnaires in patients with neck pain. In this validation study, 167 outpatients with neck pain participated. Patients received the NPDS and the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36), and used Visual Analog Scales (VASs) to assess pain and global health. To examine test-retest reliability, patients who were considered stable by clinicians were given the NPDS 2 weeks after baseline. To examine responsiveness, patients who had not undergone treatment at the time of the first data collection or had no change in treatment over 3 months were studied again 2 weeks after starting a new medication or physical therapy. Of the 167 participants, 143 completed the questionnaires (85.6%). Factor analysis showed two factors, defined as neck-pain-related disability (factor 1) and neck-related pain (factor 2). Cronbach's α coefficient for factor 1, factor 2, and total score was 0.94, 0.93, and 0.96. The intra-class correlation coefficients for the 19 more stable patients were 0.79, 0.88, and 0.87. For concurrent validity, the correlation between NPDS subscales and total score and SF-36 subscale scores ranged from r = -0.54 to -0.22 (p < 0.01). Correlations between the NPDS subscales and total score and VAS of pain ranged from 0.56 to 0.77 (p < 0.01) and those for VAS of global health ranged from 0.48 to 0.63 (p < 0.01). The NPDS subscales and total scores of the 41 patients retested after treatment were significantly improved. The Japanese version of the NPDS is a useful scale with reliability, validity, and responsiveness in assessing patients suffering from neck pain.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036130402

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21691739

DOI: 10.1007/s00776-011-0053-3


Related references

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale in patients with neck pain. European Spine Journal 24(12): 2816-2820, 2015

Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain: reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the neck pain and disability scale. Disability and Rehabilitation 26(16): 959-962, 2004

Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Neck Disability Index. Journal of Orthopaedic Science 18(1): 14-21, 2013

Reliability and validity of the finnish version of the neck disability index and the modified neck pain and disability scale. Spine 35(5): 552-556, 2010

Validity and Reliability of the Arabic Version of the Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale in Neck Pain Patients. Asian Spine Journal 12(5): 817-822, 2018

Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the neck disability index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with mechanical neck pain without upper extremity symptoms. PhysioTherapy Theory and Practice 35(12): 1328-1335, 2019

An adapted Chinese version of neck pain and disability scale: validity and reliability. Spine 36(20): E1322, 2011

Reliability and validity of the Hindi version of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale in cervical radiculopathy patients. Disability and Rehabilitation 28(22): 1405-1411, 2006

The cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale in patients with chronic neck pain: Turkish version study. Spine 37(11): E678-E682, 2012

Development of the Italian version of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale, NPDS-I: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity. Spine 33(13): E429-E434, 2008

Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the neck disability index, patient-specific functional scale, and numeric pain rating scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 89(10): 831-839, 2010

Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain: Reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale and Pain Disability Index. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 18(1-2): 37-44, 2005

Reliability and validity study of a Thai version of the Neck Disability Index in patients with neck pain. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 95(5): 681-688, 2012

Reliability and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Neck Disability Index in patients with acute neck pain in general practice. European Spine Journal 15(11): 1729-1736, 2006

Crosscultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of the neck disability index. Spine 37(21): E1343, 2012