+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Paramedic laryngoscopy in the simulated difficult airway: comparison of the Venner A.P. Advance and GlideScope Ranger video laryngoscopes



Paramedic laryngoscopy in the simulated difficult airway: comparison of the Venner A.P. Advance and GlideScope Ranger video laryngoscopes



Academic Emergency Medicine 18(7): 692-698



This study assesses intubation times and potential trauma with two new portable video laryngoscopes, the GlideScope Ranger (GSR) and the Venner A.P. Advance (APA), in a simulated difficult prehospital airway. The GSR has a hockey stick shape and is inserted by a different (midline) technique compared with direct laryngoscopy and requires the use of a stylet. The APA has a handle similar to a direct laryngoscope, but with an angulated difficult airway blade. The APA is designed to have an intuitive insertion technique somewhat similar to that of direct laryngoscopy (lateral tongue displacement) and has a guiding mechanism that foregoes the need for a stylet. Thirty qualified paramedics received a short demonstration of each device and were asked to intubate a modified Grade III difficult laryngoscopy mannequin in a random order (closed envelope technique). Optimal view and tracheal intubation times were recorded, and potential trauma assessed by the number of additional discrete forward advances and by visual analog scale (VAS). Direct laryngoscopy was used as a comparator. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for intubation times, optimal view times, percentage of glottis opening (POGO) seen, and objective trauma assessment. Student's paired t-test was used for subjective trauma assessment and a Bonferroni correction was used for the primary outcome measures. Participants declared a median of 60 (range 20 to 300) previous intubations. Time to achieve optimal view between APA and GSR was not different (20 seconds vs. 19 seconds; p = 0.19), but tracheal intubation was significantly faster with the APA (25 seconds vs. 46 seconds; p < 0.0001). Intubation success was ultimately 97% in both groups. Participants judged subjective trauma to be less for the APA than GSR on a VAS (1.6 cm vs. 3.3 cm; p < 0.001). More than three additional forward advances were required in 43% of GSR and 0% of APA intubations. Following a brief demonstration to paramedics naïve to video laryngoscopy, the APA demonstrated earlier intubation, fewer additional discrete forward advances of the tube, and less participant-judged subjective trauma when compared to the GSR in this simulation model.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036149963

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21762232

DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01115.x


Related references

Comparison of GlideScope® Cobalt and McGrath® Series 5 video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy in a simulated regurgitation/aspiration scenario. Medizinische Klinik Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin 110(3): 218-224, 2015

A comparison of direct laryngoscopy to video laryngoscopy by paramedic students in manikin-simulated airway management scenarios. African Journal of Emergency Medicine 7(4): 183-188, 2017

A Comparison of Paramedic First Pass Endotracheal Intubation Success Rate of the VividTrac VT-A 100, GlideScope Ranger, and Direct Laryngoscopy Under Simulated Prehospital Cervical Spinal Immobilization Conditions in a Cadaveric Model. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 32(6): 621-624, 2017

Comparison of C-MAC Videolaryngoscope, GlideScope Ranger and conventional laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in patients with a predicted difficult airway - A randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 27: 263-264, 2010

Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 27(1): 24-30, 2010

Comparison of five video laryngoscopes and conventional direct laryngoscopy : Investigations on simple and simulated difficult airways on the intubation trainer. Der Anaesthesist 64(7): 513-519, 2015

Comparison of the Cobalt Glidescope video laryngoscope with conventional laryngoscopy in simulated normal and difficult infant airways. Paediatric Anaesthesia 19(11): 1108-1112, 2009

A comparison between the GlideScope® classic and GlideScope® direct video laryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 33: 330-336, 2016

A paramedic study comparing the use of Airtraq, Airway Scope and Macintosh laryngoscopes in a simulated difficult airway. Anaesthesia 64(7): 810-811, 2009

A randomized comparison of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope to the standard laryngoscopy for intubation by pediatric residents in simulated easy and difficult infant airway scenarios. Pediatric Emergency Care 27(5): 398-402, 2011

Comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope and Airtraq laryngoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins. Anaesthesia 65(9): 955; Author Reply 955, 2010

Comparison of the C-MAC videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope, and Airtraq laryngoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins. Anaesthesia 65(5): 483-489, 2010

Comparison of the Truview PCD™ and the GlideScope(®) video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy in pediatric patients: a randomized trial. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 60(5): 450-457, 2013

Comparison of the Glidescope, the McGrath, the Airtraq and the Macintosh laryngoscopes in simulated difficult airways*. Anaesthesia 63(12): 1358-1364, 2008

Prehospital Glidescope video laryngoscopy for difficult airway management in a helicopter rescue program with anaesthetists. European Journal of Emergency Medicine 18(5): 282-284, 2011