+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Morphological Awareness A Key to Understanding Poor Reading Comprehension in English

Morphological Awareness A Key to Understanding Poor Reading Comprehension in English

Journal of Educational Psychology 103(3): 523-534

This longitudinal study examined the performance of poor comprehenders on several reading-related abilities in the late elementary school years. We identified 3 groups of readers in Grade 5 who were matched on word reading accuracy and speed, nonverbal cognitive ability, and age: unexpected poor comprehenders, expected average comprehenders, and unexpected good comprehenders. We compared these groups in Grade 5 and, retrospectively, in Grade 3. The 3 groups performed similarly on phonological awareness, naming speed, and orthographic processing tasks but differed in morphological awareness, even when vocabulary was controlled statistically. Unexpected poor comprehenders performed more poorly than expected average comprehenders in.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036182500

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1037/a0023495

Related references

A Quantile Regression Approach to Understanding the Relations Among Morphological Awareness, Vocabulary, and Reading Comprehension in Adult Basic Education Students. Journal of Learning Disabilities 49(4): 424-436, 2014

Multisyllabic word reading as a moderator of morphological awareness and reading comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities 47(1): 34-43, 2014

Effect of phonological and morphological awareness on reading comprehension in Hebrew-speaking adolescents with reading disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia 61(1): 44-63, 2011

Cross-Lagged Relationships between Morphological Awareness and Reading Comprehension among Chinese Children. Frontiers in Psychology 7(): 1379-1379, 2016

Morphological Awareness Intervention: Improving Spelling, Vocabulary, and Reading Comprehension for Adult Learners. Journal of Research and Practice for Adult Literacy, Secondary, and Basic Education 5(1): 49-56, 2016

Morphological awareness as a function of semantics, phonology, and orthography and as a predictor of reading comprehension in Chinese. Journal of Child Language (): 1-30, 2016

Specific reading difficulties in Chinese, English, or both: longitudinal markers of phonological awareness, morphological awareness, and RAN in Hong Kong Chinese children. Journal of Learning Disabilities 45(6): 503-514, 2013

The role of morphological awareness in reading comprehension among typical and learning disabled native Arabic speakers. Journal of Learning Disabilities 43(6): 500-514, 2011

To get hold of the wrong end of the stick: reasons for poor idiom understanding in children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 51(6): 1538-1549, 2008

Modeling the Relations Among Morphological Awareness Dimensions, Vocabulary Knowledge, and Reading Comprehension in Adult Basic Education Students. Frontiers in Psychology 7: 86-86, 2016

Italian children with dyslexia are also poor in reading English words, but accurate in reading English pseudowords. Dyslexia 19(3): 165-177, 2013

Beyond phonological and morphological processing: pure copying as a marker of dyslexia in Chinese but not poor reading of English. Annals of Dyslexia 65(2): 53-68, 2016

The contribution of theory of mind, counterfactual reasoning, and executive function to pre-readers' language comprehension and later reading awareness and comprehension in elementary school. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 144: 27-45, 2015

Syntactic awareness in relation to reading skill and ongoing reading comprehension monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 41(2): 282-299, 1986

Effects of metalinguistic awareness on reading comprehension and the mediator role of reading fluency from grades 2 to 4. Plos One 10(3): E0114417-E0114417, 2016