+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Altering the standard of care in disasters--unnecessary and dangerous

Altering the standard of care in disasters--unnecessary and dangerous

Annals of Emergency Medicine 59(3): 191-195

After September 11, 2001, the United States began examining approaches to the delivery of medical care during disasters when demand exceeds available resources. One seemingly popular option is the creation of "crisis" or "altered" care standards meant to reduce the legal standard or duty of care for medical responders. However, evidence supporting the need for reduced care standards is lacking. Concern for liability exists but it is not evidence based. The actual risk for litigation is minimal, according to experience with multiple disasters during the last 15 years. Even if a lower legal standard or duty of care were to be adopted, it is unlikely this would reduce the risk of liability because violation of this lower standard could still result in an allegation of malpractice. Creating algorithms to equitably and rationally allocate scarce resources is necessary and appropriate, but altering the legal standard of care will not contribute to this process. Rather than inhibiting the creation of these protocols, the current legal standard of care helps guarantee that disaster policies are created in an ethical and transparent manner. Adoption of a lower legal care standard would encourage implementation of less effective approaches and could undermine the impetus to constantly improve the care of disaster victims. Once lowering the legal standard of care becomes accepted practice, it becomes unclear what will prevent this process from moving downward indefinitely. The most rational approach buttressed by evidence to date supports maintaining the current legal standard of care defined by the actions of reasonably prudent physicians under the same or similar circumstances.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036203159

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21907452

DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.07.037

Related references

Pediatric hospital and intensive care unit capacity in regional disasters: expanding capacity by altering standards of care. Pediatrics 119(1): 94, 2007

Crisis Standard of Care Refocusing Health Care Goals During Catastrophic Disasters and Emergencies. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Medicine 3(4): 159-165, 2011

Altering the applicable standard of care. Law and Contemporary Problems 49(2): 265-275, 1986

Lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancer: standard of care or unnecessary risk. Current Opinion in Oncology 23(5): 507-511, 2011

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: standard of care or unnecessary risk of organ loss?. Current Opinion in Urology 9(3): 219-222, 1999

Surgery with Limited Resources in Natural Disasters: What Is the Minimum Standard of Care?. Current Trauma Reports 4(2): 89-95, 2018

Using standard clinical assessments for home care to identify vulnerable populations before, during, and after disasters. Journal of Emergency Management 15(6): 355-366, 2018

How therapists manage potentially dangerous clients: Toward a standard of care for psychotherapists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 18(1): 84-86, 1987

The dangerous unnecessary transfusion. Canadian Medical Association Journal 69(1): 38-39, 1953

Nitrite: A dangerous and unnecessary additive. CNI weekly report Community Nutrition Institute 11(6): 4-6, 1981

Untimely, unnecessary, dangerous epidermal reactions. Archives des Maladies Professionnelles de Medecine du Travail et de Securite Sociale 12(6): 658-666, 1951

Food irradiation dangerous ineffective and unnecessary. Search (North Balwyn) 23(4): 113-115, 1992

Erroneous diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia--dangerous but unnecessary?. Lakartidningen 86(11): 962-965, 1989

Dangerous Decontamination: The Unnecessary Perils of Instrument Cleaning. Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology 52(4): 322-323, 2018

Saatchi's Medical Innovation Bill: progressive, unnecessary or dangerous?. Bjog 122(11): 1436, 2015