+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Cognitive manipulation targeted at decreasing the conditioning pain perception reduces the efficacy of conditioned pain modulation



Cognitive manipulation targeted at decreasing the conditioning pain perception reduces the efficacy of conditioned pain modulation



Pain 153(1): 170-176



Although painfulness of the conditioning stimulus (CS) is required for the activation of conditioned pain modulation (CPM), it is still unclear whether CPM expression depends on the objective physical intensity of the CS or the subjective perception of its pain. Accordingly, we cognitively manipulated the perceived CS pain, rendering the physical aspects of the CPM paradigm untouched. Baseline CPM was measured among 48 young healthy male subjects using the parallel paradigm with contact heat as test pain and hand immersion in hot water as CS. Subjects were then randomized into 4 groups, all of which were cognitively manipulated as to the CS-induced pain: group 1, placebo (CS less painful); group 2, nocebo (CS more painful); and groups 3 and 4, the informed control groups for groups 1 and 2, respectively. CPM was reassessed after the manipulation. Comparing the groups by MANCOVA (multivariate analysis of covariance) revealed that placebo exerted decreased CS pain and consequent attenuation of CPM magnitudes, while nocebo elicited increased CS pain, but without CPM elevation (P<.0001). Within the placebo group, the reduction in CS pain was associated with diminished CPM responses (r=0.767; P=.001); however, no such relationship characterized the nocebo group. Pain inhibition under CPM seems to depend on the perceived level of the CS pain rather than solely its physical intensity. Cognitively decreasing the perceived CS pain attenuates CPM magnitude, although a ceiling effect may limit CPM enhancement after cognitively increased CS pain. These findings emphasize the relevance of cognitive mechanisms in determining endogenous analgesia processes in humans.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036268459

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 22119318

DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.10.010


Related references

Conditioning pain modulation reduces pain only during the first stimulation of the temporal summation of pain paradigm in healthy participants. European Journal of Pain 23(7): 1390-1396, 2019

Conditioned pain modulation is minimally influenced by cognitive evaluation or imagery of the conditioning stimulus. Journal of Pain Research 7: 689-697, 2014

A psychophysical study of endogenous analgesia: the role of the conditioning pain in the induction and magnitude of conditioned pain modulation. European Journal of Pain 15(5): 491-497, 2011

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and conditioned pain modulation influence the perception of pain in humans. European Journal of Pain 17(10): 1539-1546, 2013

Not just a matter of pain intensity: Effects of three different conditioning stimuli on conditioned pain modulation effects. Neurophysiologie Clinique 48(5): 287-293, 2018

Pain Modulation: From Conditioned Pain Modulation to Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Experimental and Clinical Pain. International Review of Neurobiology 139: 255-296, 2018

Adaptability to pain is associated with potency of local pain inhibition, but not conditioned pain modulation: a healthy human study. Pain 155(5): 968-976, 2014

General versus pain-specific cognitions: Pain catastrophizing but not optimism influences conditioned pain modulation. European Journal of Pain 23(1): 150-159, 2019

Adaptations in Evoked Pain Sensitivity and Conditioned Pain Modulation after Development of Chronic Neck Pain. Biomed Research International 2017: 8985398, 2017

THU0547Is Pain Catastrophising Associated with Impaired Conditioned Pain Modulation in People with Chronic Widespread Pain?. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 75(Suppl 2): 390.1-390, 2016

Effect of Pain Induction or Pain Reduction on Conditioned Pain Modulation in Adults: A Systematic Review. Pain Practice 15(8): 765-777, 2015

Assessment of conditioned pain modulation in healthy participants and patients with chronic pain: manifestations and implications for pain progression. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care 13(2): 99-106, 2019

Stability of conditioned pain modulation in two musculoskeletal pain models: investigating the influence of shoulder pain intensity and gender. Bmc Musculoskeletal Disorders 14: 182, 2013

Alterations in Temporal Summation of Pain and Conditioned Pain Modulation Across an Episode of Experimental Exercise-Induced Low Back Pain. Journal of Pain 20(3): 264-276, 2019

Spontaneous pain is reduced by conditioning pain modulation in peripheral neuropathy but not in fibromyalgia-Implications for different pain mechanisms. Scandinavian Journal of Pain 3(3): 113-115, 2012