EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
47,893,527
Abstracts:
28,296,643
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Foraging guild influences dependence on heterospecific alarm calls in Amazonian bird flocks






Behavioral Ecology 23(3): 544-550

Foraging guild influences dependence on heterospecific alarm calls in Amazonian bird flocks

Interspecific eavesdropping on alarm calling has been considered evidence that species participating in mixed-species groups benefit from reduced risk of predation. Few studies, however, have examined interspecific variation in dependence on and ability to evaluate alarm signals in mixed-species groups. We conducted a playback experiment to evaluate how species in different foraging guilds varied in their response to alarm calls of birds that lead Amazonian mixed-species flocks in both upland and inundated forests. We predicted that species that search nearby substrates myopically would react more strongly to alarm calls (i.e., take longer to resume foraging) than flycatching species that search for insects at a greater distance from a perch. We used likelihood functions to model the latency response to resume foraging for both upland and inundated forests samples, and we were able to detect significant differences among different foraging guilds. Our results indicate that flycatching birds respond weakest in both forest types, but contrary to our predictions, live-leaf gleaners showed a stronger response to alarms than dead-leaf–gleaning insectivores in inundated forest and no difference in upland forest. These results suggest that foraging guild may underlie different levels of dependence on public versus private information and, thus, the dependence of different species on heterospecific informants. These different levels of dependence on alarm calls provide a potential mechanistic basis for understanding assembly rules of flocks.


Accession: 036374923

DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arr222



Related references

Goodale, E.; Kotagama, S.W., 2008: Response to conspecific and heterospecific alarm calls in mixed-species bird flocks of a Sri Lankan rainforest. The flow of information about predators in mixed-species groups is likely to influence the structure and organization of these communities. To map this flow, it is necessary to demonstrate in a playback experiment that animals use the information...

Satischandra, S.H.rsha K.; Kodituwakku, P.; Kotagama, S.W.; Goodale, E., 2010: Assessing false alarm calls by a drongo Dicrurus paradiseus in mixed-species bird flocks. The suggestion that some members of mixed-species bird flocks use alarm calls when predators are not present in order to startle other species and thereby gain access to additional prey, first postulated by Munn (Munn CA. 1986. Birds that 'cr...

Magrath, R.D.; Haff, T.M.; Fallow, P.M.; Radford, A.N., 2016: Eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: from mechanisms to consequences. Animals often gather information from other species by eavesdropping on signals intended for others. We review the extent, benefits, mechanisms, and ecological and evolutionary consequences of eavesdropping on other species' alarm calls. Eave...

Houtman, Anne, 2003: The response of tree squirrels to conspecific and heterospecific alarm calls. Ploger, Bonnie J [Editor, Reprint Author], Yasukawa, Ken [Editor] Exploring animal behavior in laboratory and field: An hypothesis-testing approach to the development, causation, function, and evolution of animal behavior : 295-300

Haff Tonya M.; Magrath, R.D., 2012: Learning to listen? Nestling response to heterospecific alarm calls. Many nestling birds go silent in response to parental alarm calls, potentially lowering their risk of being overheard by predators. Parents are not always nearby, however, and so offspring could also benefit if they respond to the alarm calls of o...

Magrath, R.D.; Haff, T.M.; McLachlan, J.R.; Igic, B., 2016: Wild birds learn to eavesdrop on heterospecific alarm calls. Many vertebrates gain critical information about danger by eavesdropping on other species' alarm calls [1], providing an excellent context in which to study information flow among species in animal communities [2-4]. A fundamental but unresol...

Haff, T.M.; Magrath, R.D., 2013: Eavesdropping on the neighbours fledglings learn to respond to heterospecific alarm calls. Young birds and mammals suffer from a high risk of predation, and should be under strong selection for early response to cues indicating danger, including the alarm calls of other species. Despite this prediction, there has been little investigati...

Templeton, C.N.; Greene, E., 2007: Nuthatches eavesdrop on variations in heterospecific chickadee mobbing alarm calls. Many animals recognize the alarm calls produced by other species, but the amount of information they glean from these eavesdropped signals is unknown. We previously showed that black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) have a sophisticated al...

Fallow, P.M.; Gardner, J.L.; Magrath, R.D., 2011: Sound familiar? Acoustic similarity provokes responses to unfamiliar heterospecific alarm calls. Eavesdropping on the alarm calls of other species can provide vertebrates with valuable information about danger, and often responses to heterospecific calls seem to be acquired through learning. However, animals might not require learning to resp...

Fallow, P.M.; Pitcher, B.J.; Magrath, R.D., 2013: Alarming features: birds use specific acoustic properties to identify heterospecific alarm calls. Vertebrates that eavesdrop on heterospecific alarm calls must distinguish alarms from sounds that can safely be ignored, but the mechanisms for identifying heterospecific alarm calls are poorly understood. While vertebrates learn to identify heter...