+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Fracture load of tooth-implant-retained zirconia ceramic fixed dental prostheses: effect of span length and preparation design



Fracture load of tooth-implant-retained zirconia ceramic fixed dental prostheses: effect of span length and preparation design



Clinical Oral Implants Research 23(6): 719-725



Evaluation of the effect of different span length and preparation designs on the fracture load of tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (TIFDPs) manufactured from yttrium-stabilized zirconia frameworks. Forty-eight TIFDPs were manufactured using a CAD/CAM system and veneered with a press ceramic. Rigidly mounted implants (SLA, diameter 4.1 mm, length 10 mm) in the molar region with a titanium abutment were embedded in PMMA bases pairwise with premolars. All premolars were covered with heat-shrink tubing to simulate physiological tooth mobility. Six different test groups were prepared (a) differing in the preparation design of the premolar (inlay [i]; crown [c]), (b) the material of the premolar (metal [m]; natural human [h]) and (c) the length of the TIFDPs (3-unit [3]; 4-unit [4]). All TIFDPs underwent thermomechanical loading (TCML) (10,000 × 6.5°/60°; 6 × 10(5) × 50 N). The load to fracture (N) was measured and fracture sites were evaluated macroscopically. None of the restorations failed during TCML. The mean fracture loads (standard deviations) were 1,522 N (249) for the 3-unit, inlay-retained TIFDPs on a metal abutment tooth (3-im), 1,910 N (165) for the 3-cm group, 1,049 N (183) for group 4-im, 1,274 N (282) for group 4-cm, 1,229 N (174) for group 4-ih and 911 N (205) for group 4-ch. Initial damages within the veneering ceramic occurred before the final failure of the restoration. The corresponding loads were 24-52% lower than the fracture load values. All restorations tested could withstand the mastication forces expected. Fracture-load values for 3- and 4-unit inlay-crown and crown-crown-retained TIFDPs should spur further clinical investigation.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036405238

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21812819

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02191.x


Related references

Zirconia ceramic inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses - first clinical results with a new design. Journal of Dentistry 39(3): 208-211, 2011

Fracture behaviour of implant-implant- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses utilising zirconium dioxide implant abutments. Clinical Oral Investigations 15(1): 89-97, 2011

Fracture load of metal-ceramic, monolithic, and bi-layered zirconia-based posterior fixed dental prostheses after thermo-mechanical cycling. Journal of Dentistry 73: 97, 2018

Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments. Clinical Oral Implants Research 19(10): 1049-1053, 2008

Load-bearing capacity of implant-supported, tooth-supported, and combined zirconia-fixed dental prostheses. Implant Dentistry 20(4): 311-317, 2011

Fracture behavior of all-ceramic, implant-supported, and tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. Clinical Oral Investigations 22(4): 1663-1673, 2018

Effect of gingival ceramic veneer thickness on the fracture strength of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. American Journal of Dentistry 23(3): 147-151, 2010

Effect of veneering materials on fracture loads of implant-supported zirconia molar fixed dental prostheses. Journal of Prosthodontic Research 63(2): 140-144, 2019

Minimally invasive prosthetic restoration of posterior tooth loss with resin-bonded, wing-retained, and inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses fabricated from monolithic zirconia: A clinical report of two patients. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 117(4): 459-462, 2017

Fracture behaviour of zirconia ceramic cantilever fixed dental prostheses in vitro. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 66(4): 200-206, 2008

Load-bearing capacity of all-ceramic posterior inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses. European Journal of Oral Sciences 117(3): 312-318, 2009

Common Post-fitting Complications in Tooth-supported Fixed-Fixed Design Metal-Ceramic Fixed Dental Prostheses. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 30(3): 619-625, 2014

Effect of framework design on fracture load after thermal cycling and mechanical loading of implant-supported zirconia-based prostheses. Dental Materials Journal 37(1): 78-86, 2018

Fracture Load Before and After Veneering Zirconia Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses. Journal of Prosthodontics 25(7): 550-556, 2016

Fracture strength of prefabricated all-ceramic posterior inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses. Dental Materials 26(1): 67-75, 2010