EurekaMag
+ Translate
+ Most Popular
Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations in China
Mammalian lairs in paleo ecological studies and palynology
Studies on technological possibilities in utilization of anhydrous milk fat for production of recombined butter-like products
Should right-sided fibroelastomas be operated upon?
Large esophageal lipoma
Apoptosis in the mammalian thymus during normal histogenesis and under various in vitro and in vivo experimental conditions
Poissons characoides nouveaux ou non signales de l'Ilha do Bananal, Bresil
Desensitizing efficacy of Colgate Sensitive Maximum Strength and Fresh Mint Sensodyne dentifrices
Administration of fluid by subcutaneous infusion: revival of a forgotten method
Tundra mosquito control - an impossible dream?
Schizophrenia for primary care providers: how to contribute to the care of a vulnerable patient population
Geochemical pattern analysis; method of describing the Southeastern limestone regional aquifer system
Incidence of low birth weights in a hospital of Mexico City
Tabanidae
Graded management intensity of grassland systems for enhancing floristic diversity
Microbiology and biochemistry of cheese and fermented milk
The ember tetra: a new pygmy characid tetra from the Rio das Mortes, Brazil, Hyphessobrycon amandae sp. n. (Pisces, Characoidei)
Risk factors of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients after coronary artery intervention
Renovation of onsite domestic wastewater in a poorly drained soil
Observations of the propagation velocity and formation mechanism of burst fractures caused by gunshot
Systolic blood pressure in a population of infants in the first year of life: the Brompton study
Haematological studies in rats fed with metanil yellow
Studies on pasteurellosis. I. A new species of Pasteurella encountered in chronic fowl cholera
Dormancy breaking and germination of Acacia salicina Lindl. seeds
therapy of lupus nephritis. a two-year prospective study

Evaluation of the propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios in case of small sample size


Evaluation of the propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios in case of small sample size



Bmc Medical Research Methodology 12: 70



ISSN/ISBN: 1471-2288

PMID: 22646911

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-70

Propensity score (PS) methods are increasingly used, even when sample sizes are small or treatments are seldom used. However, the relative performance of the two mainly recommended PS methods, namely PS-matching or inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), have not been studied in the context of small sample sizes. We conducted a series of Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the influence of sample size, prevalence of treatment exposure, and strength of the association between the variables and the outcome and/or the treatment exposure, on the performance of these two methods. Decreasing the sample size from 1,000 to 40 subjects did not substantially alter the Type I error rate, and led to relative biases below 10%. The IPTW method performed better than the PS-matching down to 60 subjects. When N was set at 40, the PS matching estimators were either similarly or even less biased than the IPTW estimators. Including variables unrelated to the exposure but related to the outcome in the PS model decreased the bias and the variance as compared to models omitting such variables. Excluding the true confounder from the PS model resulted, whatever the method used, in a significantly biased estimation of treatment effect. These results were illustrated in a real dataset. Even in case of small study samples or low prevalence of treatment, PS-matching and IPTW can yield correct estimations of treatment effect unless the true confounders and the variables related only to the outcome are not included in the PS model.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036435457

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

Related references

Inverse probability weighted estimation of the marginal odds ratio: correspondence regarding 'The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios'. Statistics in medicine 27(26): 5556-9; author reply 5560-3, 2008

The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios. Statistics in Medicine 26(16): 3078-3094, 2007

The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios, Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26 :30783094. Statistics in Medicine 27(19): 3918-3920, 2008

The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios. Statistics in Medicine 32(16): 2837-2849, 2013

Sample size requirements for studies estimating odds ratios or relative risks. American Journal of Epidemiology 126(4): 758, 1987

Sample size requirements for studies estimating odds ratios or relative risks. Statistics in Medicine 7(7): 759-764, 1988

Estimation of conditional and marginal odds ratios using the prognostic score. Statistics in Medicine 36(4): 687-716, 2017

Propensity score model overfitting led to inflated variance of estimated odds ratios. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 80: 97-106, 2016

Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification. Statistics in Medicine 29(7-8): 760-769, 2010

Comparison of three methods of estimating odds ratios from a job exposure matrix in occupational case-control studies. American Journal of Epidemiology 137(4): 472-481, 1993

Decreased Susceptibility of Marginal Odds Ratios to Finite-sample Bias. Epidemiology 32(5): 648-652, 2021

A comparison of propensity score methods: a case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMi statin use. Statistics in Medicine 25(12): 2084-2106, 2006

Oversampling and replacement strategies in propensity score matching: a critical review focused on small sample size in clinical settings. Bmc Medical Research Methodology 21(1): 256, 2021

Using Average Marginal Effects Over Odds Ratios as Measures of Effect Size in Epidemiology. Annals of Epidemiology 27(8): 525-526, 2017

Performance evaluation of propensity score methods for estimating average treatment effects with multi-level treatments. Journal of Applied Statistics 46(5): 853-873, 2019