+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems



Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems



Clinical Imaging 36(4): 279-286



We studied the performance of three computed radiography and three direct radiography systems with regard to the image noise and entrance skin dose based on a chest phantom. Images were obtained with kVp of 100, 110, and 120 and mA settings of 1, 2, 4, 8, and 10. Significant differences of image noise were found in these digital chest radiography systems (P<.0001). Standard deviation was significantly different when the mAs were changed (P<.001), but it was independent of the kVp values (P=.08-.85). Up to 44% of radiation dose could be saved when kVp was reduced from 120 to 100 kVp without compromising image quality.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036461827

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 22726965

DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2011.09.006


Related references

Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 114(1-3): 273-277, 2005

Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose. Medical Physics 30(10): 2727-2735, 2003

A Case Study into the Effect of Radiographic Factors on Image Quality and Dose for a Selenium Based Digital Chest Radiography System. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 80(1): 279-282, 1998

Image quality of supine chest radiographs: intra-individual comparison of computed radiography and low-dose linear-slit digital radiography. European Radiology 19(9): 2156-2162, 2009

Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization. Rofo 177(2): 272-278, 2005

Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study. Radiographics 18(3): 745-754, 1998

Comparison of chest radiography, chest digital tomosynthesis and low dose MDCT to detect small ground-glass opacity nodules: an anthropomorphic chest phantom study. European Radiology 24(12): 3269-3276, 2014

Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems. Ajr. American Journal of Roentgenology 187(3): 630-637, 2006

Comparison of scatter rejection and low-contrast performance of scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR), slot-scan digital radiography, and full-field digital radiography systems for chest phantom imaging. Medical Physics 38(1): 23-33, 2011

Digital chest radiography--optimizing image processing parameters for the visibility of chest lesions and anatomy. European Journal of Radiology 22(3): 241-245, 1996

Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 114(1-3): 269-272, 2005

A phantom for dose-image quality optimization in chest radiography. British Journal of Radiology 75(898): 837-842, 2002

Digital chest radiography image quality assessment with dose reduction. Australasian Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine 35(1): 71-80, 2012

Dose reduction in digital chest radiography and perceived image quality. British Journal of Radiology 80(960): 984-988, 2007

A technique for simulating the effect of dose reduction on image quality in digital chest radiography. Journal of Digital Imaging 22(2): 114-125, 2009