+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Firms and sustainability Mapping the intellectual origins and structure of the corporate sustainability field

Firms and sustainability Mapping the intellectual origins and structure of the corporate sustainability field

Global Environmental Change 23(1): 382-391

Business research has repeatedly been criticized for its lack of engagement with pressing issues such as climate change, despite a surge of publications on corporate sustainability topics in recent years. We are therefore interested in identifying the knowledge development and knowledge gaps in business scholarship on the relationship between firms, environment and society. This paper provides a systematic review of the corporate sustainability field in form of a bibliometric analysis based on citation data acquired from the Social Sciences Citation Index. The final dataset contained 3117 records published between 1953 and 201Our analysis shows that, over the last 50 years, the field of corporate sustainability has emerged from a few primary nodes of research and developed into four distinct conceptual genealogies: corporate social performance theory, stakeholder theory, a corporate social performance versus economic performance debate, and a greening of management debate. The results of our analysis suggest four key findings. First, the four genealogies only comprise a relatively narrowly focused research scope. Second, there is very little integration and citation of work in other disciplinary areas such as ecology or environmental science. Third, the existing literature has a strong focus on empirically examining the relationship between a firm's environmental and/or social performance and its financial performance. Finally, there is little consideration of managerial implications and consequences of climate change in the corporate sustainability literature to date. We suggest that while this may be a reflection of an insular field, it may also be a role played by the management literature turning away from problem based issues in favor of empirical results, theory building, and the identification of variables that influence firm profitability and can be subjected to direct managerial control. We conclude by outlining pathways for future research. This paper provides a bibliometric analysis of the corporate sustainability field. Our analysis shows that the there are four distinct conceptual genealogies within this field. Despite these conceptual developments, the field is missing the emergence of new topic areas. We conclude that the management literature is not addressing problem based issues.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036557919

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.007

Related references

Proactive sustainability strategy and corporate sustainability performance: The mediating effect of sustainability control systems. Journal of Environmental Management 196: 569-582, 2017

What can we learn from corporate sustainability reporting? Deriving propositions for research and practice from over 9,500 corporate sustainability reports published between 1999 and 2015 using topic modelling technique. Plos One 12(4): E0174807, 2017

Turning sustainability into action: Explaining firms' sustainability efforts and their impact on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics 147: 73-84, 2014

Sustainability indexes: why join in? A study of the Corporate Sustainability Index (ISE) in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production 96: 161-170, 2015

Corporate sustainability ratings an investigation into how corporations use the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Cleaner Production 35(none), 2012

A framework to evaluate eco- and social-labels for designing a sustainability consumption label to measure strong sustainability impact of firms/products. Journal of Cleaner Production 182: 105-113, 2018

Boardroom gender diversity and corporate sustainability practices: Evidence from Australian Securities Exchange listed firms. Journal of Cleaner Production 149: 874-885, 2017

Exploring the differential impact of environmental sustainability, operational efficiency, and corporate reputation on market valuation in high-tech-oriented firms. International Journal of Production Economics 211: 1-14, 2019

When Does Corporate Sustainability Performance Pay off? The Impact of Country-Level Sustainability Performance. Ecological Economics 146: 325-333, 2018

Reflections on teaching and learning for sustainability from the Cascadia Sustainability Field School. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 39(3): 313-327, 2015

Broad sustainability contra sustainability: the proper construction of sustainability indicators. Ecological Economics 50(3-4): 249-260, 2004

Corporate Environmental Innovation (CEI): a government initiative to support corporate sustainability leadership. Journal of Cleaner Production 14(6-7): 589-600, 2006

Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability Separate Pasts, Common Futures. Organization & Environment 21(3): 245-269, 2008

Corporate sustainability: an integrative definition and framework to evaluate corporate practice and guide academic research. Journal of Cleaner Production 76: 12-19, 2014

Five leaps to corporate sustainability through a corporate responsibility portfolio matrix. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 17(6): 320-336, 2010