+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Is there an environmental benefit from remediation of a contaminated site? Combined assessments of the risk reduction and life cycle impact of remediation

Is there an environmental benefit from remediation of a contaminated site? Combined assessments of the risk reduction and life cycle impact of remediation

Journal of Environmental Management 112: 392-403

A comparative life cycle assessment is presented for four different management options for a trichloroethene-contaminated site with a contaminant source zone located in a fractured clay till. The compared options are (i) long-term monitoring (ii) in-situ enhanced reductive dechlorination (ERD), (iii) in-situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) with permanganate and (iv) long-term monitoring combined with treatment by activated carbon at the nearby waterworks. The life cycle assessment included evaluation of both primary and secondary environmental impacts. The primary impacts are the local human toxic impacts due to contaminant leaching into groundwater that is used for drinking water, whereas the secondary environmental impacts are related to remediation activities such as monitoring, drilling and construction of wells and use of remedial amendments. The primary impacts for the compared scenarios were determined by a numerical risk assessment and remedial performance model, which predicted the contaminant mass discharge over time at a point of compliance in the aquifer and at the waterworks. The combined assessment of risk reduction and life cycle impacts showed that all management options result in higher environmental impacts than they remediate, in terms of person equivalents and assuming equal weighting of all impacts. The ERD and long-term monitoring were the scenarios with the lowest secondary life cycle impacts and are therefore the preferred alternatives. However, if activated carbon treatment at the waterworks is required in the long-term monitoring scenario, then it becomes unfavorable because of large secondary impacts. ERD is favorable due to its low secondary impacts, but only if leaching of vinyl chloride to the groundwater aquifer can be avoided. Remediation with ISCO caused the highest secondary impacts and cannot be recommended for the site.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036579806

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 22985675

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.002

Related references

Environmental impacts of remediation of a trichloroethene-contaminated site: life cycle assessment of remediation alternatives. Environmental Science and Technology 44(23): 9163-9169, 2011

Use of life cycle assessments to evaluate the environmental footprint of contaminated sediment remediation. Environmental Science and Technology 45(10): 4235-4241, 2011

Combining life cycle analysis, human health and financial risk assessment for the evaluation of contaminated site remediation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 57(7): 1101-1121, 2014

Two-scale evaluation of remediation technologies for a contaminated site by applying economic input-output life cycle assessment: risk-cost, risk-energy consumption and risk-CO2 emission. Journal of Hazardous Materials 192(3): 1234-1242, 2012

Use of life cycle assessments for improved decision making in contaminated sediment remediation. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 7(2): 304-305, 2011

Can thermal soil remediation be sustainable? A case study of the environmental merit of the remediation of a site contaminated by a light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL). Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 8(2): 103-121, 2011

Contaminated land, ecological assessment, and remediation conference series (CLEAR 2012): environmental pollution and risk assessments. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 20(12): 8313-8315, 2014

Friends or foes? Monetized Life Cycle Assessment and Cost-Benefit Analysis of the site remediation of a former gas plant. Science of the Total Environment 619-620: 258-271, 2017

Life cycle assessment as a tool for controlling the development of technical activities: application to the remediation of a site contaminated by sulfur. Advances in Environmental Research 8(3-4): 613-627, 2004

Remediation of Heavy Metal Contaminated Soils: An Overview of Site Remediation Techniques. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 41(10): 879-914, 2011

Successful co-compost remediation project points the way to 45% reduction in oil spill contaminated soil remediation costs. Proceedings - World Petroleum Congress = Actes et Documents - Congres Mondial du Petrole 16, Vol, 2000

Contaminated Land, Ecological Assessment, and Remediation Conference Series (CLEAR 2014): environmental remediation with advanced materials. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23(2): 949-950, 2016

Assessing effects of site characteristics on remediation secondary life cycle impact with a generalised framework. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 57(7): 1083-1100, 2014

A framework for net environmental benefit analysis for remediation or restoration of contaminated sites. Environmental Management 34(3): 315-331, 2004

Cultural impact assessments and environmental remediation decisionmaking. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International (Sp. Iss. 2): 85-89, 2000