+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Independent multicenter study of Riata and Riata ST implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads



Independent multicenter study of Riata and Riata ST implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads



Heart Rhythm 10(3): 361-365



Riata and Riata ST leads (St Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA) are prone to failure. There are no independent multicenter reports regarding Riata or Riata ST lead performance. To conduct a retrospective multicenter study of Riata and Riata ST leads that were implanted and followed at 7 centers. The study included adults who received St Jude Medical Riata or Riata ST leads. Data for Quattro Secure leads were obtained from an earlier study. From 2002 to 2010, 1081 patients received a Riata (n = 774) or Riata ST (n = 307) lead. Follow-up was longer for Riata than Riata ST leads (4.2 ± 2.4 years vs 3.3 ± 1.7 years; P<.0001). During the study, 67 leads failed (6.2%), including 62 of 774 Riata (8.0%) and 5 of 307 Riata ST (1.6%) leads. Forty-seven of 67 lead failures (70.1%) were caused by electrical malfunction, and 20 lead failures (29.9%) were due to externalized conductors (ECs) that were electrically intact. Of 110 leads examined fluoroscopically, ECs were found in 26 of 81 Riata (32%) and 1 of 29 Riata ST (3.4%) leads. Of 26 Riata leads with ECs, 7 (27%) were malfunctioning. Riata leads had lower overall and malfunction free survival compared to Quattro leads (P<.0001), while Riata ST lead survival was not different (P = .422). The survival of Riata (but not Riata ST) leads was lower than Quattro leads; however, Riata ST leads had significantly shorter follow-up than Riata leads. ECs were common in Riata leads, and more than a quarter of Riata leads that had ECs were malfunctioning. Our observations suggest that systematic fluoroscopic examination of patients with Riata leads is appropriate.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036643319

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23128017

DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.10.045


Related references

Deaths caused by the failure of Riata and Riata ST implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads. Heart Rhythm 9(8): 1227-1235, 2013

Prevalence of asymptomatic and electrically undetectable intracardiac inside-out abrasion in silicon-coated Riata® and Riata® ST implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads. International Journal of Cardiology 167(1): 254-257, 2014

Transvenous extraction of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads under advisory--a comparison of Riata, Sprint Fidelis, and non-recalled implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads. Heart Rhythm 10(10): 1444-1450, 2014

Transvenous extraction of implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads under advisory a a comparison of Riata, Sprint Fidelis, and non-recalled implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads. 2013

Prevalence of externalized conductors in Riata and Riata ST silicone leads: results from the prospective, multicenter Riata Lead Evaluation Study. Heart Rhythm 10(12): 1778-1782, 2014

Independent Multicenter Study of Riata and Riata ST ICD Leads. Heart Rhythm 9(9): 1577-1578, 2012

Insulation defects in Riata implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads. Internal Medicine 51(19): 2689-2694, 2013

Mechanical and electrical dysfunction of Riata implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads. Europace 16(12): 1787-1794, 2015

Riata implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead failure: analysis of explanted leads with a unique insulation defect. Heart Rhythm 9(5): 742-749, 2013

Cable externalization at the proximal portion of the superior vena cava coil in Riata implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads. Journal of Cardiology Cases 15(1): 3-5, 2018

Cable externalization and electrical failure of the Riata family of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Rhythm 12(6): 1233-1240, 2016

Riata and Riata ST defibrillator leads failure: cable externalization is one problem, but other electrical failures seem more preoccupant. European Heart Journal 34(Suppl 1): P1396-P1396, 2013

Prospective long-term evaluation of Optim-insulated (Riata ST Optim and Durata) implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads. Heart Rhythm 11(12): 2156-2162, 2015

Long-Term Performance of the Riata/ST Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Lead. American Journal of Cardiology 117(5): 807-812, 2016

Very late perforation by a Riata implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead-A case report. Journal of Arrhythmia 34(3): 319-321, 2018