+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Increasing lead burden correlates with externalized cables during systematic fluoroscopic screening of Riata leads



Increasing lead burden correlates with externalized cables during systematic fluoroscopic screening of Riata leads



Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 37(1): 63-68



Riata and Riata ST defibrillator leads (St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA, USA) have been recalled due to increased risk of insulation failure leading to externalized cables. As this mechanical failure does not necessarily correlate with electrical failure, it can be difficult to diagnose. Fluoroscopic screening can identify insulation failure. Studies have suggested that insulation failure is predominantly seen in 8-Fr, single-coil models. Our patients have exclusively dual-coil leads and a high proportion of 7-Fr leads. Fluoroscopic screening was performed in 48 patients with recalled Riata leads. Twenty-three patients had 8-Fr Riata leads and 25 patients had 7-Fr Riata ST leads. Images were recorded in at least three projections and studies were reviewed by seven attending electrophysiologists. Externalized cables were seen in ten patients (21 %), and another five patients (10 %) had abnormal cable spacing. All device interrogations showed normal parameters. Patients with abnormal leads had more leads in situ (2.5 ± 0.7 vs. 1.6 ± 0.8 leads; P = 0.002) and a higher rate of nonischemic cardiomyopathy (80 vs. 24 %; P = 0.03). There were no differences between the groups with regards to patient age, body mass index, lead age, lead parameters, or vascular access site. There was no difference with regard to lead size (P = 0.76). The Riata family of leads has a high incidence of mechanical failure, as demonstrated on fluoroscopic screening. In this study, the 7-Fr models were just as likely to mechanically fail as the 8-Fr models. Increasing lead burden and a diagnosis of nonischemic cardiomyopathy correlated with insulation failure.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036672490

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23254319

DOI: 10.1007/s10840-012-9760-8


Related references

High prevalence of insulation failure with externalized cables in St. Jude Medical Riata family ICD leads: fluoroscopic grading scale and correlation to extracted leads. Heart Rhythm 9(8): 1218-1224, 2013

Lead thrombi associated with externalized cables on Riata ICD leads: a case series. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 24(9): 1047-1050, 2014

Prevalence of externalized conductors in Riata and Riata ST silicone leads: results from the prospective, multicenter Riata Lead Evaluation Study. Heart Rhythm 10(12): 1778-1782, 2014

Prevalence and presentation of externalized conductors and electrical abnormalities in Riata defibrillator leads after fluoroscopic screening: report from the Netherlands Heart Rhythm Association Device Advisory Committee. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 5(6): 1059-1063, 2013

Nationwide fluoroscopic screening of recalled Riata defibrillator leads in Denmark. Heart Rhythm 10(6): 821-827, 2014

Fluoroscopic screening of asymptomatic patients implanted with the recalled Riata lead family. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 5(4): 809-814, 2012

Longitudinal follow-up of externalized Riata leads. American Journal of Cardiology 112(10): 1616-1618, 2014

A case of in vivo thrombogenicity of an externalized Riata ST lead. Europace 15(3): 428, 2013

Labelled leucocyte scintigraphy in an infected externalized Riata lead. Europace 16(10): 1442, 2015

Contribution of ethylenetetrafluoroethylene (ETFE) insulation to the electrical performance of Riata® silicone leads having externalized conductors. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 37(2): 141-145, 2014

Fluoroscopic investigation of Riata® transvenous defibrillator leads. Cardiology Journal 22(1): 57-67, 2016

Fluoroscopic and electrical assessment of a series of defibrillation leads: prevalence of externalized conductors. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 35(12): 1498-1504, 2013

Failure of fluoroscopy to detect "inside-out" insulation failure and externalized conductors in a Riata ICD lead. Heart Rhythm 10(12): 1827-1828, 2014

Prospective nationwide fluoroscopic and electrical longitudinal follow-up of recalled Riata defibrillator leads in Denmark. Heart Rhythm 11(12): 2141-2147, 2015

Riata lead failure with normal electrical lead parameters and normal fluoroscopic appearance. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 36(1): 87-89, 2013