+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Enrichment-based DNA methylation analysis using next-generation sequencing: sample exclusion, estimating changes in global methylation, and the contribution of replicate lanes



Enrichment-based DNA methylation analysis using next-generation sequencing: sample exclusion, estimating changes in global methylation, and the contribution of replicate lanes



Bmc Genomics 13 Suppl 8: S6



DNA methylation is an important epigenetic mark and dysregulation of DNA methylation is associated with many diseases including cancer. Advances in next-generation sequencing now allow unbiased methylome profiling of entire patient cohorts, greatly facilitating biomarker discovery and presenting new opportunities to understand the biological mechanisms by which changes in methylation contribute to disease. Enrichment-based sequencing assays such as MethylCap-seq are a cost effective solution for genome-wide determination of methylation status, but the technical reliability of methylation reconstruction from raw sequencing data has not been well characterized. We analyze three MethylCap-seq data sets and perform two different analyses to assess data quality. First, we investigate how data quality is affected by excluding samples that do not meet quality control cutoff requirements. Second, we consider the effect of additional reads on enrichment score, saturation, and coverage. Lastly, we verify a method for the determination of the global amount of methylation from MethylCap-seq data by comparing to a spiked-in control DNA of known methylation status. We show that rejection of samples based on our quality control parameters leads to a significant improvement of methylation calling. Additional reads beyond ~13 million unique aligned reads improved coverage, modestly improved saturation, and did not impact enrichment score. Lastly, we find that a global methylation indicator calculated from MethylCap-seq data correlates well with the global methylation level of a sample as obtained from a spike-in DNA of known methylation level. We show that with appropriate quality control MethylCap-seq is a reliable tool, suitable for cohorts of hundreds of patients, that provides reproducible methylation information on a feature by feature basis as well as information about the global level of methylation.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036682686

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23281662

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-s8-s6


Related references

Estimating absolute methylation levels at single-CpG resolution from methylation enrichment and restriction enzyme sequencing methods. Genome Research 23(9): 1541-1553, 2014

Next-Generation Sequencing-Based RiboMethSeq  Protocol for Analysis of tRNA 2'-O-Methylation. Biomolecules 7(1), 2017

DNA Methylation Analysis by Bisulfite Conversion Coupled to Double Multiplexed Amplicon-Based Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS). Methods in Molecular Biology 1767: 367-382, 2018

QNB: differential RNA methylation analysis for count-based small-sample sequencing data with a quad-negative binomial model. Bmc Bioinformatics 18(1): 387, 2017

Global Analysis of DNA Methylation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by a Liquid Hybridization Capture-Based Bisulfite Sequencing Approach. Journal of Hepatology 64(2): S575-S576, 2016

Global analysis of DNA methylation in hepatocellular carcinoma by a liquid hybridization capture-based bisulfite sequencing approach. Clinical Epigenetics 7: 86, 2015

SNP-guided identification of monoallelic DNA-methylation events from enrichment-based sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Research 42(20): E157, 2015

Quality evaluation of methyl binding domain based kits for enrichment DNA-methylation sequencing. Plos One 8(3): E59068, 2013

Quantification of the methylation status of the PWS/AS imprinted region: comparison of two approaches based on bisulfite sequencing and methylation-sensitive MLPA. Molecular and Cellular Probes 21(3): 208-215, 2007

The global DNA methylation surrogate LINE-1 methylation is correlated with MGMT promoter methylation and is a better prognostic factor for glioma. Plos One 6(8): E23332, 2011

Targeted DNA methylation analysis by next-generation sequencing. Journal of Visualized Experiments 2016(96), 2016

The application of next generation sequencing in DNA methylation analysis. Genes 1(1): 85-101, 2010

Whole Genome DNA Methylation Analysis Using Next-Generation Sequencing (BS-seq). Methods in Molecular Biology 1667: 223-287, 2018

Comparative assessment of DNA methylation patterns between reduced representation bisulfite sequencing and Sequenom EpiTyper methylation analysis. Epigenomics 9(6): 823-832, 2017

Standard DNA methylation analysis in mouse epidermis: bisulfite sequencing, methylation-specific PCR, and 5-methyl-cytosine (5mC) immunological detection. Methods in Molecular Biology 1094: 221-231, 2014