+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Daily suspended sediment load prediction using artificial neural networks and support vector machines



Daily suspended sediment load prediction using artificial neural networks and support vector machines



Journal of Hydrology 478: 50-62



In recent decades, development of artificial intelligence, as a predictor for hydrological phenomenon, has created a great change in predictions. This paper investigates the abilities of Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models to predict daily suspended sediment load (SSL) in Doiraj River, located in the west part of Iran. An 11-year data (1994 2004) was applied for predicting SSL. Streamflow and rainfall were used as the model inputs and SSL as the model output. The best input of SVM and ANN models was identified using combination of Gamma Test and Genetic Algorithm (GT GA). Its results accuracy was compared with the results of conventional correlation coefficient analysis between input and output variables and the best combination was identified. Also, the present study explores Gamma Test to identify the length of the training dataset. Finally, in order to predict SSL, we used the nu-SVR (using the four kernels including linear, polynomial, sigmoid and Radial Basis Function (RBF)) and ANN models (based on BFGS algorithm and Conjugate algorithm). The reliability of SVM and ANN models were evaluated based on performance criteria such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Efficiency Index (EI) and correlation coefficient (R 2). The obtained results show that ANN models and nu-SVR model using Gamma Test for input selection has better performance than regression combination. Also, the performance BFGS-ANN model were better than other models with RMSE value and R 2 equal to 0.34 (ton) and 0.99, respectively. The nu-SVR model with RBF kernel has more capability in prediction of SSL than the other kernels (RMSE=0.96 (ton) and R 2 =0.98). In addition, the results show M-test can be used as a new method to determine the number of required data for network training for creating a smooth model by nu-SVR and ANN models. We identify the most effective variables on prediction in order of importance degree. We select the best combination of model inputs for predicting suspension load. We determine how many data is considered for training of ANN and SVM models.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036687072

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.11.048


Related references

Prediction of ubiquitin proteins using artificial neural networks, hidden markov model and support vector machines. In Silico Biology 7(6): 559-568, 2007

An Estimation of the Suspended Sediment Load Using Adaptive Network Based Fuzzy Inference System, Support Vector Machine and Artificial Neural Network Models. Water Resources Management 31(4): 1343-1359, 2017

Modeling daily suspended sediment load using improved support vector machine model and genetic algorithm. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 25(35): 35693-35706, 2018

Artificial neural networks for estimating daily total suspended sediment in natural streams. Nordic Hydrology 37(1): 69-79, 2006

Monthly evaporation forecasting using artificial neural networks and support vector machines. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 124(1-2): 69-80, 2016

Suspended sediment load prediction of river systems: An artificial neural network approach. Agricultural Water Management 98(5): 855-866, 2011

A comparative study of support vector machines and artificial neural networks for predicting precipitation in Iran. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 119(3-4): 723-731, 2015

Comparison of artificial neural networks an support vector machines for feature selection in electrogastrography signal processing. Conference Proceedings 2010: 2774-2777, 2010

Electrocardiogram pattern recognition and analysis based on artificial neural networks and support vector machines: a review. Journal of Healthcare Engineering 4(4): 465-504, 2013

Assessing the applicability of TMPA-3B42V7 precipitation dataset in wavelet-support vector machine approach for suspended sediment load prediction. Journal of Hydrology 550: 103-117, 2017

Novel solutions for an old disease: diagnosis of acute appendicitis with random forest, support vector machines, and artificial neural networks. Surgery 149(1): 87-93, 2011

A comparative study of artificial neural networks and support vector machines for predicting groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer. Journal of Hydrology 396(1-2): 128-138, 2011

Arrhythmia identification with two-lead electrocardiograms using artificial neural networks and support vector machines for a portable ECG monitor system. Sensors 13(1): 813-828, 2013

A comparative study of artificial neural networks and support vector machines for predicting ground water levels in a coastal aquifer. Journal of Hydrology 396.1-2, 2011

Prediction Of Forced Expiratory Volume (Fev 6 ) In FlowVolume Spirometry Using Support Vector Machines And Radial Basis Function Neural Networks. Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology 10(4): 683-693, 2010