+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Simulating the effects of harvest and biofuel production on the forest system carbon balance of the Midwest, USA

Simulating the effects of harvest and biofuel production on the forest system carbon balance of the Midwest, USA

GCB Bioenergy 5(4): 431-444

Forests of the Midwestern United States are an important source of fiber for the wood and paper products industries. Scientists, land managers, and policy makers are interested in using woody biomass and/or harvest residue for biofuel feedstocks. However, the effects of increased biomass removal for biofuel production on forest production and forest system carbon balance remain uncertain. We modeled the carbon (C) cycle of the forest system by dividing it into two distinct components: (1) biological (net ecosystem production, net primary production, autotrophic and heterotrophic respiration, vegetation, and soil C content) and industrial (harvest operations and transportation, production, use, and disposal of major wood products including biofuel and associated C emissions). We modeled available woody biomass feedstock and whole-system carbon balance of 220 000 km2 of temperate forests in the Upper Midwest, USA by coupling an ecosystem process model to a collection of greenhouse gas life-cycle inventory models and simulating seven forest harvest scenarios in the biological ecosystem and three biofuel production scenarios in the industrial system for 50 years. The forest system was a carbon sink (118 g C m?2 yr?1) under current management practices and forest product production rates. However, the system became a C source when harvest area was doubled and biofuel production replaced traditional forest products. Total carbon stores in the vegetation and soil increased by 5 10% under low-intensity management scenarios and current management, but decreased up to 3% under high-intensity harvest regimes. Increasing harvest residue removal during harvest had more modest effects on forest system C balance and total biomass removal than increasing the rate of clear-cut harvests or area harvested. Net forest system C balance was significantly, and negatively correlated (R2 = 0.67) with biomass harvested, illustrating the trade-offs between increased C uptake by forests and utilization of woody biomass for biofuel feedstock.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036703088

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12033

Related references

Modeling harvest and biomass removal effects on the forest carbon balance of the Midwest, USA. Environmental Science & Policy 25(none), 2013

The greenhouse gas intensity and potential biofuel production capacity of maize stover harvest in the US Midwest. Global Change Biology Bioenergy 9(10): 1543-1554, 2017

Carbon balance effects of U.S. biofuel production and use. Climatic Change 138(3-4): 667-680, 2016

Commentary on "carbon balance effects of US biofuel production and use," by DeCicco et al. (2016). Climatic Change 144(2): 111-119, 2017

Carbon balance in bioregenerative life support systems: some effects of system closure, waste management, and crop harvest index. Advances in Space Research 31(1): 169-175, 2003

Carbon balance of a forest ecosystem after stump harvest. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 27(8): 762-773, 2012

Simulating the carbon balance of a temperate larch forest under various meteorological conditions. Carbon Balance and Management 2: 6, 2007

Impacts of land use change due to biofuel crops on carbon balance, bioenergy production, and agricultural yield, in the conterminous United States. GCB Bioenergy 4(3): 277-288, 2012

From set-aside grassland to annual and perennial cellulosic biofuel crops: Effects of land use change on carbon balance. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 182-183: 1-12, 2013

Simulating effects of harvest cutting on snowmelt in Colorado subalpine forest. Proceedings series: 4 191-196, 1972

An innovative system for zero carbon biofuel and food production. Agriculture For Development: 4-7, 2008

Integration of biofuel production into district heating part I: an evaluation of biofuel production costs using four types of biofuel production plants as case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production 69: 176-187, 2014

How the choice of biofuel system in a small-scale Swedish organic farm affects food production and NPK balance. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B - Soil & Plant Science 64(2): 109-120, 2014

Simulating the effects of light intensity and carbonate system composition on particulate organic and inorganic carbon production in Emiliania huxleyi. Journal of Theoretical Biology 372: 192-204, 2016

Relative importance of climate and land surface changes on hydrologic changes in the US Midwest since the 1930s Implications for biofuel production. Journal of Hydrology 497: 110-120, 2013