+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

The osseointegration behavior of titanium-zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits

The osseointegration behavior of titanium-zirconium implants in ovariectomized rabbits

Clinical Oral Implants Research 25(7): 819-825

The aim of this study is to compare the osseointegration behavior of titanium (Ti) and titanium zirconium (TiZr) implants in ovariectomized (OVX) rabbits. Twelve ovariectomized New Zealand rabbits submitted to a hypocalcic diet and 12 sham-aged rabbits were used. After the bone mass loss induction period, TiZr or Ti implants both benefiting from a SLActive surface treatment were randomly inserted in the tibia and femur of each animal. The total of 24 rabbits were divided in four groups (n = 6): SHAM + Ti, OVX + Ti, SHAM + TiZr,OVX + TiZr. The animals were respectively sacrificed 3 and 6 weeks after dental implant placement. Six implants in each group at each time point were subjected to removal torque testing, and the remaining implants were prepared for histomorphometric analysis. At the end of the healing period, all implants were osseointegrated. The removal torque value of the SHAM-TiZr group was significantly higher than those of the SHAM-Ti group (P < 0.001). The removal torque of the OVX-Ti group was significantly lower than those of the OVX-TiZr group. All groups demonstrated an increase in the peak torque value after 6 weeks: 46.0 and 50.8 Ncm for the OVX and the SHAM animals, respectively, in the case where Ti implants were used. When TiZr implants were inserted, the values reached 60.7 and 76.2 Ncm with a similar group configuration. The BIC and the BA/TA analysis showed an increase between week 3 and 6 in the case of nonovariectomized animals. From week 3 to 6, the BIC went from 37.1 14.3 to 47.7 8.7 for the SHAM + Ti group and from 37.6 10.9 to 50.4 11 for the SHAM + TiZr group. The BIC values were not significantly different between groups. The parameters intended to be representative of the bone morphology (BIC & BATA) did not help to discriminate between Ti and TiZr which appeared to behave similarly in this experimental model. However, the removal torque values for the TiZr group were statistically higher than those of the Ti group in both the SHAM and the ovariectomized animals. That likely reflected an increased quality of bone around the TiZr implants.

(PDF same-day service: $19.90)

Accession: 036778806

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23432001

DOI: 10.1111/clr.12141

Related references

Impact of plaque accumulation on the osseointegration of titanium-zirconium alloy and titanium implants. A histological and immunohistochemical analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research 26(11): 1281-1287, 2014

Experimental study of osseointegration of zirconium and titanium dental implants. Morfologiia 127(1): 52-55, 2005

A comparative study of zirconium and titanium implants in rat: osseointegration and bone material quality. Journal of Materials Science. Materials in Medicine 25(2): 411-422, 2014

Osseointegration of titanium alloy and HA-coated implants in healthy and ovariectomized animals: a histomorphometric study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 20(11): 1272-1277, 2010

Effect of zoledronic acid on osseointegration of titanium implants: an experimental study in an ovariectomized rabbit model. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 68(3): 515-523, 2010

Effects of alcohol consumption on osseointegration of titanium implants in rabbits. Implant Dentistry 13(3): 232-237, 2004

Artifacts in multimodal imaging of titanium, zirconium and binary titanium-zirconium alloy dental implants: an in vitro study. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology (): 20160267-20160267, 2016

In vitro assessment of artifacts induced by titanium, titanium-zirconium and zirconium dioxide implants in cone-beam computed tomography. Clinical Oral Implants Research 26(10): 1222-1228, 2014

Enhanced osseointegration of titanium implants with nanostructured surfaces: an experimental study in rabbits. Acta Biomaterialia 11: 494-502, 2015

Nanotubes Functionalized with BMP2 Knuckle Peptide Improve the Osseointegration of Titanium Implants in Rabbits. Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology 11(2): 236-244, 2015

Effect of zoledronate acid treatment on osseointegration and fixation of implants in autologous iliac bone grafts in ovariectomized rabbits. Bone 50(1): 119-127, 2012

Effect of Recombinant Human Growth Hormone on Osseointegration of Titanium Implants: A Histologic and Biomechanical Study in Rabbits. Journal of Oral Implantology 41(4): E102-E109, 2014

Low-level laser therapy affects osseointegration in titanium implants: resonance frequency, removal torque, and histomorphometric analysis in rabbits. Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 42(1): 2-8, 2016

Osseointegration is improved by coating titanium implants with a nanostructured thin film with titanium carbide and titanium oxides clustered around graphitic carbon. Materials Science & Engineering. C, Materials for Biological Applications 70(Pt 1): 264-271, 2016

Osseointegration by bone morphogenetic protein-2 and transforming growth factor beta2 coated titanium implants in femora of New Zealand white rabbits. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics 45(1): 57-62, 2011