+ Site Statistics
References:
52,654,530
Abstracts:
29,560,856
PMIDs:
28,072,755
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Opposing determinants of compliance and interrogative suggestibility



Opposing determinants of compliance and interrogative suggestibility



Personality and Individual Differences 54(8): 918-924



The Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales (GSS 1 2) can illuminate social and cognitive factors which affect forensic interviewees vulnerability to pressure from interrogators. Variations of the GSS procedure can highlight detail in the dynamics of interrogative suggestibility (IS). Induced malingering is one such variation. The present study used this method in an attempt to reconcile conflicting findings of two previous malingering studies. An innovation was to pre-test participants on the standard GSS 2 to identify them as showing Low, Medium, or High IS. These groups then undertook the parallel GSS 1 but with the instruction to role-play a suspect who is attempting to appear abnormally suggestible. showed marked differences in the direction in which faking scores changed, from those at pre-testing, between the Low and the High groups, with the High group showing a decrease in GSS scores and the Low group an increase: the Medium group scores followed the trend of the Low group scores. It is suggested that these results explain why previous results using induced malingering have been inconsistent. The results are also discussed in terms of how differing expectancies and levels of interpersonal trust may affect interviewees. Investigated malingering on the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales. Attempt to reconcile conflicting findings of previous malingering studies. Innovation was to pre-test participants on the standard GSS 2. Three test groups Low, Medium, High interrogative suggestibility. Marked between-group differences in the direction of score change on faking task.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036809402

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2013.01.004


Related references

Patterns of malingering and compliance in measures of interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences 40(3): 453-461, 2006

Interrogative suggestibility: Life adversity, neuroticism, and compliance. Personality and Individual Differences 48(4): 493-498, 2010

Comparison between Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale 2 GSS2 and Bonn Test of Statement Suggestibility BTSS in measuring children’s interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences 51(4): 488-491, 2011

Further data on interrogative suggestibility and compliance scores following instructed malingering. Legal and Criminological Psychology 15(2): 221-228, 2010

Historical background to suggestibility how interrogative suggestibility differs from other types of suggestibility. Personality & Individual Differences 8(3): 347-356, 1987

The problem of interviewing drug addicts in custody: A study of interrogative suggestibility and compliance. Psychology Crime & Law 2(3): 185-195, 1996

A study in the relationship between interrogative suggestibility, compliance and social desirability in institutionalised adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences 36(2): 485-494, 2004

The plasticity of early memory reports: social pressure, hypnotizability, compliance, and interrogative suggestibility. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 47(4): 320-345, 1999

The effects of alcohol withdrawal on mental state, interrogative suggestibility and compliance: an experimental study. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry 13(1): 53-67, 2002

Interrogative suggestibility, compliance and false confessions among prisoners and their relationship with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms. Psychological Medicine 38(7): 1037-1044, 2008

The effect of cognitive load on faking interrogative suggestibility on the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale. Personality and Individual Differences 54(7): 845-849, 2013

Measuring interrogative suggestibility in children: Reliability and validity of the bonn test of statement suggestibility. Psychology Crime & Law 6(1): 61-70, 2000

Interrogative suggestibility: cross-cultural stability of psychometric and correlational properties of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales. Personality and Individual Differences 38(1): 177-186, 2005

Interrogative suggestibility: factor analysis of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (GSS 2). Personality and Individual Differences 13(4): 479-481, 1992

Measuring interrogative suggestibility with the Italian version of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales (GSS): Factor structure and discriminant validity. Personality and Individual Differences 82: 258-265, 2015