+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Differences in impact of long term caregiving for mentally ill older adults on the daily life of informal caregivers: a qualitative study



Differences in impact of long term caregiving for mentally ill older adults on the daily life of informal caregivers: a qualitative study



Bmc Psychiatry 13: 103



Owing to the policy of extramuralization of care in most Western countries older people with severe mental illness have to rely more and more on informal caregivers for daily care. Caregivers themselves are often aged, and although caregiving implies an impact on daily life that exceeds the boundaries of usual informal care, the impact differs across caregivers. Some caregivers seem to suffer more than others, and the differences cannot be fully understood by factors currently known to exacerbate the burden of caregiving. In order to help caregivers reduce the impact of caregiving it is important to gain a deeper understanding of factors influencing the burden and its impact on the caregiver's life. With this in mind, the aim of the study is to explore and understand differences in the impact of long-term caregiving on the quality of life of caregivers who look after older adults with severe mental illness. A qualitative, associative, inductive strategy and continuous simultaneous coding were used to interpret the data of 19 semi-structured interviews. We identified an underlying psychological factor "perceived freedom of choice" which explains the gross differences in impact, leading to a definition of two main types of caregivers. Depending on how people perceive freedom of choice to provide care, the consequences of caregiving can be characterized as a process of gain (type 1) or loss (type 2). Four influential factors deepen the impact of caregiving for the type 2 caregivers, and two subtypes are identified for this category. Consequences of caregiving are most readily seen in a deteriorating quality of the relationship with the care recipient and in the psychosocial well-being of the caregiver. The concept of freedom of choice adds to our understanding of the differences and explains the variation in impact on the caregivers' life. The type 1 caregiver generally experiences gain whereas type 2 generally experiences loss, which puts the latter group typically at risk of becoming overloaded. Whether people perceive that they have freedom of choice in caregiving is an important consideration in evaluating the type of intervention needed to support caregivers.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036826509

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23537066

DOI: 10.1186/1471-244x-13-103


Related references

The Impact of Informal Caregiving for Older Adults on the Health of Various Types of Caregivers: A Systematic Review. Gerontologist 2018:, 2018

Depressive symptoms among informal caregivers of older adults: insights from the Singapore Survey on Informal Caregiving. International Psychogeriatrics 24(8): 1335-1346, 2012

Caregiving to Older Adults: Determinants of Informal Caregivers' Subjective Well-being and Formal and Informal Support as Alleviating Conditions. Journals of Gerontology. Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 73(6): 1099-1111, 2018

"I do the best I can": caregivers' perceptions of informal caregiving for older adults in Belize. International Journal of Aging and Human Development 72(1): 1-25, 2011

Positive Caregiving Characteristics as a Mediator of Caregiving Burden and Satisfaction With Life in Caregivers of Older Adults. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology 31(6): 329-335, 2018

Long-term caregiving after stroke: the impact on caregivers' quality of life. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing 38(5): 354-360, 2006

Informal and formal long-term care for frail older adults in Cairo, Egypt: family caregiving decisions in a context of social change. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 24(1): 63-76, 2009

The Impact of Informal Caregiving on the Cognitive Function of Older Caregivers: Evidence From A Longitudinal, Population-Based Study. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 26(3): S151-S152, 2018

Impact of informal caregiving on caregivers' health and quality of life: analysis of gender inequalities. Gaceta Sanitaria 22(5): 443-450, 2008

The impact of different types of informal caregiving on cognitive functioning of older caregivers: Evidence from a longitudinal, population-based study in Germany. Social Science and Medicine 214: 12-19, 2018

Socioeconomic and Demographic Disparities in Caregiving Intensity and Quality of Life in Informal Caregivers: A First Look at the National Study of Caregiving. Journal of Gerontological Nursing 43(6): 17-24, 2017

Preferences for receiving information among frail older adults and their informal caregivers: a qualitative study. Family Practice 29(6): 742-747, 2012

"It Just Consumes Your Life": Quality of Life for Informal Caregivers of Diverse Older Adults With Late-Life Disability. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care 33(7): 644-650, 2016

(Cost)-effectiveness of case-management by district nurses among primary informal caregivers of older adults with dementia symptoms and the older adults who receive informal care: design of a randomized controlled trial [ISCRTN83135728. Bmc Public Health 5: 133, 2005

Poster Review of Subjective Caregiver Impact Experience and Needs of Informal Caregivers of Adults/older Adults With Cancer. European Journal of Cancer 47: S311-S312, 2011