EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Assessing the spatial uncertainty in soil nitrogen mapping through stochastic simulations with categorical land use information


Ecological Informatics 16: 1-9
Assessing the spatial uncertainty in soil nitrogen mapping through stochastic simulations with categorical land use information
This study explores the capability of an extended sequential Gaussian simulation algorithm with incorporation of categorical land use information (SGS-CI) for simulating spatial variability of soil total nitrogen (TN) contents and assessing associated spatial uncertainty. 402 sampled data in soil TN contents in a county scale region and the categorical land use map data of the study area were used to perform sequential simulations for comparing the SGS-CI algorithm and the conventional SGS algorithm, and 135 validation samples were used to assess the improvement of SGS-CI over SGS in prediction accuracy and uncertainty reduction. showed that the validation data were more strongly correlated with the optimal prediction (i.e., E-type estimates) data of SGS-CI than with those of SGS, and the mean error and the root mean square error of the optimal prediction using SGS-CI were smaller than those using SGS. SGS-CI also performed slightly better than SGS in uncertainty modeling in terms of accuracy plots and goodness statistic G. In addition, because demands for soil total nitrogen by different crops are usually different in agricultural practice, we showed that SGS-CI could be used to assess spatial uncertainty of deficiency or abundance degrees of soil TN based on demands of different crops in different land use types. Therefore, SGS-CI may provide an effective method for improving prediction accuracy and reducing uncertainty in soil TN prediction.


Accession: 036849295

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.04.001



Related references

Assessing spatial uncertainty in mapping soil erodibility factor using geostatistical stochastic simulation. Environmental Earth Sciences 66(4): 1111-1125, 2012

Simulating spatial distributions, variability and uncertainty of soil arsenic by geostatistical simulations in geographic information systems. Open Environmental Journal: 26-33, 2008

A stochastic approach for assessing the uncertainty of rainfall-runoff simulations. Water Resources Research 40(1): W01106, 2004

Uncertainty assessment of soil water content spatial patterns using geostatistical simulations: An empirical comparison of a simulation accounting for single attribute and a simulation accounting for secondary information. Ecological Modelling 205(3-4): 323-335, 2007

Assessing the spatial uncertainty of mapping trace elements in cultivated fields. Communications in soil science and plant analysis6(1-3): 253-274, 2005

Assessing and mapping spatial associations among oral cancer mortality rates, concentrations of heavy metals in soil, and land use types based on multiple scale data. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11(2): 2148-2168, 2015

Modelling spatial uncertainty of soil erodibility factor using joint stochastic simulation. Land Degradation and Development 19(2): 198-213, 2008

Assessing spatial uncertainty in predictive geomorphological mapping; a multi-modelling approach. Computers & Geosciences 36.3, 2010

The indicator approach to categorical soil data: II. Application to mapping and land use suitability analysis. Journal of Soil Science 44(2): 369-381, 1993

Spatial variability and temporal dynamics analysis of soil erosion due to military land use activities: Uncertainty and implications for land management. Land Degradation and Development 18(5): 519-542, 2007