+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Do foods imported into the UK have a greater environmental impact than the same foods produced within the UK?

Do foods imported into the UK have a greater environmental impact than the same foods produced within the UK?

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 18(7): 1325-1343

This study of seven foods assessed whether there are modes or locations of production that require significantly fewer inputs, and hence cause less pollution, than others. For example, would increasing imports of field-grown tomatoes from the Mediterranean reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by reducing the need for production in heated greenhouses in the UK, taking account of the additional transport emissions? Is meat production in the UK less polluting than the import of red meat from the southern hemisphere?We carried out a life-cycle inventory for each commodity, which quantified flows relating to life-cycle assessment (LCA) impact categories: primary energy use, acidification, eutrophication, abiotic resource use, pesticide use, land occupation and ozone depletion. The system boundary included all production inputs up to arrival at the retail distribution centre (RDC). The allocation of production burdens for meat products was on the basis of economic value. We evaluated indicator foods from which it is possible to draw parallels for foods whose production follows a similar chain: tomatoes (greenhouse crops), strawberries (field-grown soft fruit), apples (stored for year-round supply or imported during spring and summer), potatoes (early season imports or long-stored UK produce), poultry and beef (imported from countries such as Brazil) and lamb (imported to balance domestic spring autumn supply).Total pre-farm gate global warming potential (GWP) of potatoes and beef were less for UK production than for production in the alternative country. Up to delivery to the RDC, total GWP were less for UK potatoes, beef and apples than for production elsewhere. Production of tomatoes and strawberries in Spain, poultry in Brazil and lamb in New Zealand produced less GWP than in the UK despite emissions that took place during transport. For foods produced with only small burdens of GWP, such as apples and strawberries, the burden from transport may be a large proportion of the total. For foods with inherently large GWP per tonne, such as meat products, burdens arising from transport may only be a small proportion of the total.When considering the GWP of food production, imports from countries where productivity is greater and/or where refrigerated storage requirement is less will lead to less total GWP than axiomatic preference for local produce. However, prioritising GWP may lead to increases in other environmental burdens, in particular leading to both greater demands on and decreasing quality of water resources.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036863931

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

DOI: 10.1007/s11367-013-0576-2

Related references

Status of inspection of imported foods after introduction of the positive list system for agricultural chemical residues in foods mainly about analysis of pesticide residue in foods. Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi. Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan 48(4): J299-J302, 2007

Identifying sustainable foods: the relationship between environmental impact, nutritional quality, and prices of foods representative of the French diet. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics 114(6): 862-869, 2014

A case history: Replacing imported foods with local foods. League for International Food Education newsletter: 1-2, 1979

The U.S. demand for imported and domestically produced foods: an investigation of intertemporal and substitution effects. Agricultural economics: the journal of the International Association of Agricultural Economics 1(4): 309-326, 1988

Alliesthesia is greater for odors of fatty foods than of non-fat foods. Appetite 57(3): 615-622, 2011

The impact of imported foods on the traditional Inuit diet. Arctic Medical Research 47(Suppl. 1): 128-133, 1988

Studies on chemical analysis of mycotoxin xv. analysis of nivalenol and deoxynivalenol in imported cereals baby foods and processed foods confectioneries. Bulletin of National Institute of Hygienic Sciences (Tokyo) (104): 113-118, 1986

Studies on the chemical analysis of mycotoxin (XV). Analysis of nivalenol and deoxynivalenol in imported cereals, baby foods and processed foods (confectioneries). Eisei Shikenjo Hokoku. Bulletin of National Institute of Hygienic Sciences 1986(104): 113-118, 1986

Nutritional value of locally produced foods and potential for developing age-appropriate complementary foods for children under 2 years of age in Mali. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 31(3): 391-399, 2010

Environmental measurements and inspections on imported foods and feedstuffs in Greece after the Fukushima accident. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 156(4): 465-474, 2013

Nuts, beans, seeds: high-impact foods, low-impact co$t. A diet rich in these foods confers numerous health benefits--and gives a big bang for your food buck. Dukemedicine Healthnews 18(5): 6-6, 2012

Protecting our foods from environmental intrusion. 4. Naturally occurring toxicants in foods. Food technology: 38(8) 55-59, 1969

Protecting our foods from environmental intrusion. 5. The problem of salmonellae in foods. Food technology: 23(9) 74,76, 1969

Foods of the future: the impact of functional foods in the cereal industry. Cereal foods world 44(2): 94-95, 1999

Potential dietary impact of substituting non fat foods for comparable fat containing foods. FASEB Journal 5(6): A1666, 1991