EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
52,725,316
Abstracts:
28,411,598
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Prospects of using Bayesian model averaging for the calibration of one-month forecasts of surface air temperature over South Korea


Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 49(3): 301-311
Prospects of using Bayesian model averaging for the calibration of one-month forecasts of surface air temperature over South Korea
In this study, we investigated the prospect of calibrating probabilistic forecasts of surface air temperature (SAT) over South Korea by using Bayesian model averaging (BMA). We used 63 months of simulation results from four regional climate models (RCMs) with two boundary conditions (NCEP-DOE and ERA-interim) over the CORDEX East Asia. Rank histograms and residual quantile-quantile (R-Q-Q) plots showed that the simulation skills of the RCMs differ according to season and geographic location, but the RCMs show a systematic cold bias irrespective of season and geographic location. As a result, the BMA weights are clearly dependent on geographic location, season, and correlations among the models. The one-month equal weighted ensemble (EWE) outputs for the 59 stations over South Korea were calibrated using the BMA method for 48 monthly time periods based on BMA weights obtained from the previous 15 months of training data. The predictive density function was calibrated using BMA and the individual forecasts were weighted according to their performance. The raw ensemble forecasts were assessed using the flatness of the rank histogram and the R-Q-Q plot. The results showed that BMA improves the calibration of the EWE and the other weighted ensemble forecasts irrespective of season, simulation skill of the RCM, and geographic location. In addition, deterministic-style BMA forecasts usually perform better than the deterministic forecast of the single best member.


Accession: 036916722

DOI: 10.1007/s13143-013-0029-7



Related references

Calibrated surface temperature forecasts from the Canadian ensemble prediction system using bayesian model averaging. Monthly Weather Review 135(4): 1364-1385, 2007

Calibration and uncertainty analysis of the SWAT model using genetic algorithms and Bayesian model averaging. Journal of Hydrology 374.3-4, 2009

A hierarchical bayesian model to quantify uncertainty of stream water temperature forecasts. Plos One 9(12): E115659-E115659, 2015

Evaluating explanatory models of the spatial pattern of surface climate trends using model selection and bayesian averaging methods. Climate Dynamics 39(12): 2867-2882, 2012

Bayesian model averaging of Bayesian network classifiers over multiple node-orders: application to sparse datasets. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part B, Cybernetics 35(6): 1302-1310, 2005

Bayesian calibration, comparison and averaging of six forest models, using data from Scots pine stands across Europe. Forest Ecology and Management 289: 255-268, 2013

The value of model averaging and dynamical climate model predictions for improving statistical seasonal streamflow forecasts over Australia. Water Resources Research 49(10): 6671-6687, 2013

The value of model averaging and dynamical climate model predictions for improving statistical seasonal streamflow forecasts over Australia. Water Resources Research 49(10): 6671-6687, 2013

Multiobjective calibration of land surface model evapotranspiration predictions using streamflow observations and spaceborne surface radiometric temperature retrievals. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 108(D23): 4725, 2003

Estimation of anthropogenic pollution using a Bayesian contamination model; an application to fractured bedrock groundwater from Han River watershed, South Korea. Environmetrics 20.3, 2009