+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A comparative trial of the GlideScope(R) video laryngoscope to direct laryngoscope in children with difficult direct laryngoscopy and an evaluation of the effect of blade size



A comparative trial of the GlideScope(R) video laryngoscope to direct laryngoscope in children with difficult direct laryngoscopy and an evaluation of the effect of blade size



Anesthesia and Analgesia 117(1): 176-181



GlideScope® video laryngoscope (GVL) has been proposed to be useful for airway management, but its efficacy for difficult airways has not been confirmed in pediatric patients. In this study, we evaluated the usefulness of the GVL for improving the laryngoscopic view in patients whose Cormack and Lehane grade (C&L grade) was ≥3 under direct laryngoscopy. We also assessed the effect of GVL blade size on the laryngoscopic view. This randomized open trial was conducted in a tertiary pediatric center. Patients whose previous C&L grade was ≥3, or who were anticipated to have a difficult airway, were enrolled. The initial modified C&L grade was scored using a direct laryngoscope (DL). If the patient’s C&L grade was ≥3, the laryngoscopic view was scored again using GVLw (selected based on weight) and GVLs (1 size smaller than GVLw) in random order by a single experienced anesthesiologist. All laryngoscopic views were graded both with and without the backward, upward, and right lateral displacement of the thyroid cartilage (BURP) maneuver. The primary outcome was the difference in the C&L grade between DL and GVLw, and the secondary outcome was that between GVLw and GVLs. For statistical analysis, the modified C&L grade was converted to an ordinal scale. Data from 23 pediatric patients were analyzed. When compared with DL, improvement of laryngoscopic view with the GVLw wa not obvious (98.3% confidence interval for differences of ordinal scale, 0–1 without BURP, P = 0.15 and 0–1 with BURP, P = 0.11). However, GVLs improved the laryngoscopic view in comparison with both DL (98.3% CI for differences, 3.5–5.0 without BURP, P = 0.00007 and 3.5–4.5 with BURP, P = 0.0001) and GVLw (98.3% CI for differences, 3.0–4.5 without BURP, P = 0.00007 and 2.5–4.0 with BURP, P = 0.0001). There was no adverse outcome during this study. In patients with C&L grade ≥3 under direct laryngoscopy, GVLs significantly improved the laryngoscopic view when compared with DL or GVLw. The GVLs is recommended for improving the laryngoscopic view in patients with a difficult airway.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 036945050

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23687227

DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318292f0bf


Related references

Measurement of forces applied using a Macintosh direct laryngoscope compared with a Glidescope video laryngoscope in patients with predictors of difficult laryngoscopy: A randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 36(3): 221-226, 2019

Assessing usefulness of GlideScope ® video laryngoscope in children with difficult direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia Critical Care and Pain Medicine 37(5): 471-472, 2018

Evaluation of the GlideScope Direct: A New Video Laryngoscope for Teaching Direct Laryngoscopy. Anesthesiology Research and Practice 2012: 820961, 2012

A comparison between the GlideScope Video Laryngoscope and direct laryngoscope in paediatric patients with difficult airways - a pilot study. Anaesthesia 65(4): 353-357, 2010

Measurement of forces applied using a Macintosh direct laryngoscope compared with the GlideScope video laryngoscope in patients with at least one difficult intubation risk. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 25(3): 250-251, 2013

A comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope and standard direct laryngoscopy in children with immobilized cervical spine. Pediatric Emergency Care 28(12): 1317-1320, 2012

A prospective randomized equivalence trial of the GlideScope Cobalt® video laryngoscope to traditional direct laryngoscopy in neonates and infants. Anesthesiology 116(3): 622-628, 2012

Comparison of the McGrath ® MAC video laryngoscope with direct Macintosh laryngoscopy for novice laryngoscopists in children without difficult intubation: A randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia Critical Care and Pain Medicine 36(5): 261-265, 2017

Evaluation of the Airtraq video laryngoscope as a rescue device after difficult direct laryngoscopy. Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia Y Reanimacion 65(10): 552-557, 2018

Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway. Anesthesiology 116(3): 629-636, 2012

Comparative Effectiveness of the C-MAC Video Laryngoscope Versus Direct Laryngoscopy in the Setting of the Predicted Difficult Airway. Survey of Anesthesiology 57(1): 46-47, 2013

Tracheal intubation performed with GlideScope® video laryngoscope and direct laryngoscopy in neonates and infants. Anesthesiology 117(4): 914, 2012

Comparison the applications of tracheal intubation with GlideScope video laryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope in snoring patients. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 27(9): 468-470, 2013

First-Attempt Intubation Success of Video Laryngoscopy in Patients with Anticipated Difficult Direct Laryngoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the C-MAC D-Blade Versus the GlideScope in a Mixed Provider and Diverse Patient Population. Anesthesia and Analgesia 122(3): 740-750, 2016

Comparison between the Truview PCD™ or the GlideScope® video laryngoscope and direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in pediatric patients. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 60(7): 735-736, 2013